If you believe in Atheism, you're an idiot...

Harrison · #1 01-23-2011, 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bled12345 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_...ound_radiation

proof the big bang happened, Science is just the darndest thing.

I'm a through and through atheist.... Is this thread for real? lolz

There used to be "proof" that the Earth was flat, too. What about a Geocentric solar system? lawl

soup · #2 01-23-2011, 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There used to be "proof" that the Earth was flat, too. What about a Geocentric solar system? lawl

Too bad it was society that accepted the flat earth, not science.

Or are you going to try and tell me that society at that time was focused on science? rofl

bled12345 · #3 01-23-2011, 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There used to be "proof" that the Earth was flat, too. What about a Geocentric solar system? lawl

did you even read any of it....

Its not talking about atlas carrying the world on his back, or egyptian gods carrying the sun across the sky in a canoe. /facepalm, it's actually talking about *science*

the 2 guys who discovered this most compelling proof yet that the big bang actually happened won a nobel (sp?) prize for their works. Please ACTUALLY read it before using mystical claims from the 6th century to shoot down my post. kk thx bye.

Toehammer · #4 01-23-2011, 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bled12345 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

did you even read any of it....

Its not talking about atlas carrying the world on his back, or egyptian gods carrying the sun across the sky in a canoe. /facepalm, it's actually talking about *science*

the 2 guys who discovered this most compelling proof yet that the big bang actually happened won a nobel (sp?) prize for their works. Please ACTUALLY read it before using mystical claims from the 6th century to shoot down my post. kk thx bye.

actually, THE guy who theoretically predicted the cosmic microwave background got SCREWED out of a Nobel when the two who saw the experimental evidence won it... pretty big controversy in the physics community

Harrison · #5 01-23-2011, 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bled12345 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

did you even read any of it....

Its not talking about atlas carrying the world on his back, or egyptian gods carrying the sun across the sky in a canoe. /facepalm, it's actually talking about *science*

the 2 guys who discovered this most compelling proof yet that the big bang actually happened won a nobel (sp?) prize for their works. Please ACTUALLY read it before using mystical claims from the 6th century to shoot down my post. kk thx bye.

Science is just as accurate as are those claims made back then.

We are constantly in a state of trying to figure things out we had once taken for granted as absolute truth, or near to it.

Shit, if even as little a time ago as 100 years someone told you we're going to go to the moon, they'd fucking laugh at you.

chtulu · #6 01-23-2011, 10:27 PM

Toehammer · #7 01-23-2011, 11:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chtulu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The announcer/show organizer didn't really capture what the scientists think. The whole big bang idea doesn't propose that collapse and subsequent secondary expansion cannot happen. In fact it is a quite logical extension of the theory. The big bang merely says that there was a maximum explosive mass divergence at some point in time, not that something comes from nothing. That's a common misconception. I think a cool theory that some people have suggested is multiple big bangs happening. However a single big bang?

I just thought of this... if we ever see the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation change significantly... like go up/down and then equilibrate... that might be definite proof that there are multiple universes/big bangs and we have "met up" and the CMB from our universes are mixing like particles in a box (basic stat mech!).

I once sat through a colloquium about the first 10^-34 seconds of the universe (inflation theory)... that is sorta new.

I like the direction this thread is turning.

chtulu · #8 01-24-2011, 12:32 AM

bled12345 · #9 01-24-2011, 03:34 AM

lol at cricket nut shot

Toehammer · #10 01-24-2011, 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chtulu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Dark matter and energy still (if they are ANYTHING like real energy and mass) should warp spacetime in a negative divergent fashion. Sorry, that was too nerdy, that should read: gravity, due to (dark)matter/energy, should be attractive, thus a contraction is not contradicted by darkmatter but expedited! Dark energy is also not responsible for the expansion of the universe... my cosmology is getting a bit out of date (not billions of years out of date, maybe back to 2008 or so hehehehe). It could be due to dark matter/energy effects but we know so little about them now it is difficult to pin down.

Quote:

Originally Posted by bled12345 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol at cricket nut shot

Indeed! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Nothing like getting hit in the groin to humble a physicist talking like a know-it-all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Harrison [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ITT: Chtulu posts youtube videos about concepts he can't understand, much less spell properly.

Ehh, cut him a break, you know that whole Eintstein quote about imagination>knowledge... cliche but true.

Although I myself am quite a spelling nazi, Especially on a forum with spelchek.