Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #19  
Old 01-05-2011, 09:10 PM
DetroitVelvetSmooth DetroitVelvetSmooth is offline
Sarnak

DetroitVelvetSmooth's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 490
Default The rules do favor soloers in situations like this...

With the way the rules are set up groups are disincentivised. So a group of 6 is holding down 4 rooms that have named spawns a la lguk undead side. One 50 mage enters and camp checks, then says "you cant have 4 camps, im taking the frenzieds, b/c section 8 art. 2 blah blah blah." Ok, fine, now we have some down time, thats cool, just being friendly. Now another 49 Necro shows up, same thing, takes the supplier, now the 6 are down to 2 rooms, and there is no challange or fun being had. People get bored, leave, and once again, playing the game the way it was meant to be played is made impossible. Ever had that happen? Should the definition of "camp" be flexible if a case like this went to the GM's?
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:37 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.