tmo

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by GradnerLives [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Flailing with RL attacks, admitting to MQ/SEQ use among officer/leader core, calling Jeremy a liar then backpedaling like crazy once proof is posted.

Yikes.

the truth, you can call empire toxic all you want, but not in 6 months has anyone posted proof of them doing anything wrong.

I aint sain they're not bad apples in any bunch, but if there are in Empire they are smart enough to not shitpost and get caught cheating at the same time.

Call anyone you want toxic, but one group is both toxic and cheats openly... And still looses lol wut.

[Fael]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the truth, you can call empire toxic all you want, but not in 6 months has anyone posted proof of them doing anything wrong.

I aint sain they're not bad apples in any bunch, but if there are in Empire they are smart enough to not shitpost and get caught cheating at the same time.

Call anyone you want toxic, but one group is both toxic and cheats openly... And still looses lol wut.

I think Colgate is a cool bro. Got nothing against him. However I would suggest that training good guys at PD counts as "doing [some]thing wrong."

[MEGANS LAW]

Originally Posted by Fael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think Colgate is a cool bro. Got nothing against him. However I would suggest that training good guys at PD counts as "doing [some]thing wrong."

*allegedly.

[Fael]

Sirken's conviction of "cwall" is incontrovertible proof. Or do you suggest that He was in error.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Fael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sirken's conviction of "cwall" is incontrovertible proof. Or do you suggest that He was in error.

and the problem here is if he was in error in this situation then all those other suspensions bannings can be called into question. Then you don't have a standard.

[dontbanpls]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

and the problem here is if he was in error in this situation then all those other suspensions bannings can be called into question. Then you don't have a standard.

the standard is gms just throw darts at a dart board and assign a color to each guild, where ever the dart lands that is who gets suspended. Also don't forget about the 42 day reset.

[MEGANS LAW]

Originally Posted by Fael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sirken's conviction of "cwall" is incontrovertible proof. Or do you suggest that He was in error.

Do you have the IP of who was playing Cwall at the time of the alleged train? Do you have positively linking Colgate to this nefarious bard named "cwall?"

I rest my case your honor. Pras be to Brell and kill all erudites.

[B4EQWASCOOL]

Originally Posted by MEGANS LAW [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you have the IP of who was playing Cwall at the time of the alleged train? Do you have positively linking Colgate to this nefarious bard named "cwall?"

I rest my case your honor. Pras be to Brell and kill all erudites.

The judge, jury and prosecution (Sirken) has ruled against your guild. He didn't rule against Cwall... He ruled against Empire.

Do I need to spell it out? He probably has proof.

Try to keep up, book burner.

Long live the Erudites of Odus!