The Earth stands on the brink of its sixth mass extinction and the fault is ours

[Luminari]

Originally Posted by Orruar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Maybe you should spend less time being sarcastic and more time investigating whether your own opinions are based on solid fact. Or do you now accept that the "civilization will fall by 2050" scenario is based on junk science?

You wouldn't know science if it smacked you in the face seeing as how you believe in evolution and abiogenesis.

[myriverse]

Originally Posted by Luminari [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You wouldn't know science if it smacked you in the face seeing as how you believe in evolution and abiogenesis.

...

Oh, the irony....

[Luminari]

Originally Posted by myriverse [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

...

Oh, the irony....

I know, that was my point. The irony of people claiming to adhere to science that believe in things that have zero basis in science. Science requires both observation and experimentation of which evolution and abiogenesis provide neither of. Only people who have no clue whatsoever about science actually believe these things because they are too dumb to actually think for themselves.

[mgellan]

Originally Posted by Luminari [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I know, that was my point. The irony of people claiming to adhere to science that believe in things that have zero basis in science. Science requires both observation and experimentation of which evolution and abiogenesis provide neither of. Only people who have no clue whatsoever about science actually believe these things because they are too dumb to actually think for themselves.

What does evolution have to do with abiogenesis? Do you need to know intimate details of what the initial state of a process is to believe that there actually is a process at work, especially when there are multiple converging but independant lines of evidence for the existence of this process?

Seems like you're conflating the two concepts to justify lack of acceptance of the current scientific consensus. Don't claim to base your opinions on science when you're making elementary mistakes.

Regards,
Mg

[Luminari]

Originally Posted by mgellan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What does evolution have to do with abiogenesis? Do you need to know intimate details of what the initial state of a process is to believe that there actually is a process at work, especially when there are multiple converging but independant lines of evidence for the existence of this process?

Seems like you're conflating the two concepts to justify lack of acceptance of the current scientific consensus. Don't claim to base your opinions on science when you're making elementary mistakes.

Regards,
Mg

My point is that there is no scientific basis for either abiogenesis or evolution. All observations and experiments refute both ideas. First, life can only come from life so we can automatically rule out abiogenesis. Second, organisms can only produce more of what they already are so we can rule out evolution as well. Bacteria remains bacteria. Birds remain birds. Bees remain bees. Ants remain ants. Cats remain cats. Dogs remain dogs. Nothing evolves.

Only idiots believe this shit considering all observable and experimental evidence contradicts it. Then these same morons think they are the ones that actually understand science lol. No wonder this country and world are collapsing. Up has become down. Left has become right. Light has become dark. Truth has become lies. There's wayyyy to many dumb fucking people.

[Lojik]

Originally Posted by Luminari [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There's wayyyy to many dumb fucking people.

Tell me about it. The worst part is they don't even know how fucking dumb they are, they think they're fucking geniuses

[Itap]

Originally Posted by Luminari [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bacteria remains bacteria. Birds remain birds. Bees remain bees. Ants remain ants. Cats remain cats. Dogs remain dogs. Nothing evolves.

Do you also believe the Earth is only a few thousand years old?

And Dinosaur fossils are created out of rock and plaster?

[Luminari]

Originally Posted by Itap [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you also believe the Earth is only a few thousand years old?

And Dinosaur fossils are created out of rock and plaster?

No. The Earth is very old and dinosaurs in no way evidence for evolution whatsoever. In fact, fossils disprove evolution because there are countless living fossils. AKA creatures that are extremely old and found in the fossil record dating back millions of years that still exist today. No evolution whatsoever. Still the same exact creature it was 100-500 million years ago as it is today. We've got 2 billion year old preserved bacteria specimens that are identical to the modern day version. Every living organism remains what it is, period.

"The irony is that you claim to understand any science. You clearly don't."

No idiot, it's you that doesn't. People like you are everything that is wrong with this world. You're so fucking dumb it's a joke. You're so incapable of comprehending how basic scientific principles work that it's a joke. Your entire existence is a fucking joke.

And even more ironic is that creationism is just as supportive of abiogenesis.

This sentence doesn't even make sense idiot.

[myriverse]

Originally Posted by Luminari [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I know, that was my point. The irony of people claiming to adhere to science that believe in things that have zero basis in science. Science requires both observation and experimentation of which evolution and abiogenesis provide neither of. Only people who have no clue whatsoever about science actually believe these things because they are too dumb to actually think for themselves.

The irony is that you claim to understand any science. You clearly don't.