Terror attack in Charleston

[MrSparkle001]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The pre Sandy hook definition of terrorist requires the perpetrator to reside somewhere outside of the nation in which they have committed the act of terror in question.

Yes, you can commit an act of terror without being a terrorist by definition. By any actual definition he's a "freedom fighter", which doesn't require you to be fighting for freedom. Although in this case the individual in question believed the ones he was killing were actually some sort of problem/threat but that's beside the point and not worth anything besides noting aside.

Timothy McVeigh was a terrorist many years before Sandy Hook.

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If only there were laws to prevent people from bringing such dangerous weapons into religious establishments, this would never have happened!

Oh wait, there is. (In South Carolina).

Because laws prevent people from committing crimes and doing evil things [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Just like gun control would have made sure he never had that weapon to begin with, you know because criminals respect gun laws.