Hey Forsaken

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by cs616 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Can we just pretend that we disagree? Us agreeing on something is confusing and makes me feel unclean.

Don't let emotional bias cloud your judgement. We probably agree on a lot more than you'd think.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

^^^ Holy crap at this wall of text. Your level of immersion is daunting. I now feel bad for you personally. Find a new obsession.

---Deflection

You do realize most of that text..... is copy/pasted from your posts.

Fuck that's funny and your new claim is pretty ironic.

[Man0warr]

Originally Posted by cs616 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Making rules up as you go to exclude a newly formed guild based on the history of individual members just seems to go against the whole reason class R was created. Class R was supposed to be the non-competitive raiding class, but instead of competing for mobs, the competition is to get included in the class it seems. Even if it is 97% the same people (which im guessing is a grossly exaggerated number), it is a new guild with different leadership, and they should be afforded the same opportunity as any other new guild.

It's not an exaggerated number, Rogean posted the exact percentage in his suspension thread. Looks like 69/74 Members were TMO so that's 94%?

Also, Class R wasn't made to be non-competitive. It's the RESTRICTED Class, which all that means is a guild can't lockdown all spawns like TMO was doing to force the Class system by Rogean. Guilds in Class R are restricted to 1 kill for every 3 spawns.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by cs616 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Even if it is 97% the same people (which im guessing is a grossly exaggerated number).

Grossly exaggerated? Lol. It's a little more than 3% over what Rogean stated. I do not believe that qualifies as "grossly exaggerated."

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

---Deflection

You do realize most of that text..... is copy/pasted from your posts.

Fuck that's funny and your new claim is pretty ironic.

Prove it.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Prove it.

Ok Kiddo. I'm gonna leave you alone now. Clearly you are having a mental break.

[cs616]

If I have 100 apples in a basket, and I take 50 and put them in a new basket, and then add another two that were not from the original basket, that is not 96% of the same people. It is 50% of the same people. Unless TMO had 100 members and 97 left to join forsaken (or some variation of equal proportion), you guys dont know how comparative percentages work.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok Kiddo. I'm gonna leave you alone now. Clearly you are having a mental break.

If people using your "debate" tactics against you are automatically having a mental break, what does that say about your own mental state?

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=189856

Q17

Ya don't see that in there.

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by cs616 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If I have 100 apples in a basket, and I take 50 and put them in a new basket, and then add another two that were not from the original basket, that is not 96% of the same people. It is 50% of the same people. Unless TMO had 100 members and 97 left to join forsaken (or some variation of equal proportion), you guys dont know how comparative percentages work.

Yay for Math. You must not live in the USA most people here can't understand these basic functions.