![]() |
|
#11
|
||||
|
Quote:
A iksar monk without a fungi & a slowed mob, requires zero healing. So the shaman can focus on plague & pox, or just buffing/regen. The result is steady full mana xp. with an enchanter the shaman will have to reduce his mana to 0 healing the pet, and requiring a med break. This is a fact. There is no way around it, I have tried. On the contrary with a cleric an enchanter will have zero downtime, the pet will remain full HP and the cleric will remain full mana. With a monk, a shaman will not require a medbreak, and is therefore obviously superior to the enchanter. Sde by side the amount of killing is not one sided as some may think, I can promise this is the truth because I've leveled two shaman's to 60 and also an enchanter to 60. With the Shamans I consistently preferred monks for this reason, and with the enchanter I consistently preferred clerics. Lastly a monk is a lot easier to keep alive than an enchanter, should things go wrong. In a blink of an eye the enchanter could be gone. The risk vs reward is yet another reason to promote a Monk & Shaman is a superior combo than Enchanter & Shaman. All this said, enchanter shaman is a great combination and you will out level your other friends trying to pug a 6 man KC basement group. | |||
|
|
||||
|
|