Do we have to use the old character skins?

[Denzal]

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Using the secrets of faydwer client I believe will allow you to switch between classic/luclin models, why would you want to?

I love how just because you don't like something other people automatically don't as well.

[Qenaden]

Originally Posted by Denzal [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I love how just because you don't like something other people automatically don't as well.

Though I'd normally agree with this sentiment, the later EQ char models are objectively terrible. Like the Dragon Ball Z movie.

[Itchybottom]

Originally Posted by Qenaden [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Though I'd normally agree with this sentiment, the later EQ char models are objectively terrible. Like the Dragon Ball Z movie.

You can't readily argue an objective trait when it comes to art, unless there are definitions of form that a particular art is adhering to. Subjectively, is surely what you meant. Even if you argue the polygon count, they're pretty efficient -- which would be an OBJECTIVE argument.

As far as the original topic goes.... Either use a newer client, or load up a debugger and start messing with your client. All you have to do is enable all expansions client side, and you have all of your new models in Titanium on Project 1999.

[dredge]

.

[Lazortag]

Originally Posted by Itchybottom [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can't readily argue an objective trait when it comes to art, unless there are definitions of form that a particular art is adhering to. Subjectively, is surely what you meant. Even if you argue the polygon count, they're pretty efficient -- which would be an OBJECTIVE argument.

As far as the original topic goes.... Either use a newer client, or load up a debugger and start messing with your client. All you have to do is enable all expansions client side, and you have all of your new models in Titanium on Project 1999.

Actually, Qenadan is right, the dragonball z movie is objectively bad.

[Qenaden]

Originally Posted by Itchybottom [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can't readily argue an objective trait when it comes to art, unless there are definitions of form that a particular art is adhering to. Subjectively, is surely what you meant. Even if you argue the polygon count, they're pretty efficient -- which would be an OBJECTIVE argument.

As far as the original topic goes.... Either use a newer client, or load up a debugger and start messing with your client. All you have to do is enable all expansions client side, and you have all of your new models in Titanium on Project 1999.

Nope, I meant objective. They're objectively terrible. And you most certainly can argue anything from a standpoint of objectivity -- it simply requires a degree of tenacity.

[Alkorin]

The thread you're looking for is http://www.project1999.org/forums/sh...ad.php?t=12085.

There are numerous issues with the SoF client that are posted in the thread. Consider yourself warned.