![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Checkraise Dragonslayer <Retired>
"My armor color matches my playstyle" | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
While I'm for removal of PNP, I can easily see how it protects newer/under geared players from just getting greifed out. I'd be for a middle ground where if your taged empire/az/friends, or participating w said guilds, pnp does not apply to you, tho you will need to respect pnp if pvping an non-waved pnp guild
__________________
Ksah <Empire>
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
pvp is why we play red - for a new player it should be in effect for higher end guilds - pnp should be removed good thoughts ksah | |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
limit pnp to only new players say sub 50 or something like that - or even depending on tagged guilds | |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||||
|
Quote:
While I appreciate your feedback, if you actually read the PNP/LNS policy I think even you would agree how much of a mess it is. When you play on red you agree to the blue PNP + the Red PNP contracts, which are so horribly vague and open to player interpretation. The staff can basically ban your account for doing any sort of pvp or pve. Under the current ruleset contesting a spawn could be considered zone disruption as players are trying to raid and you are disrupting it. Your account is subject to the staff member who responds personal opinion on the matter, as the rules are so vague that it is impossible to fairly enforce. Quote:
Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||||
|
Last edited by Lime; 04-30-2015 at 11:38 AM..
|
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|