|
|
|
|
#1
12-07-2010, 02:17 PM
|
|||
|
I realize there are tons of errors in those DBs, I had just thought that p99 used them as a starting point and made corrections from there. Or at least used them as a reference, the assumption being that at some point there was research put into those datasets (which would then be classic valid for any non-revamped mobs/zones).
I.e. I'm just confused where the 50%/50%, 65% value came from, and whether similar issues might be in other loot tables which may be harder to check by players (rarer mobs, etc). Kunark looks great! Just curious about the approach I guess
__________________
Ravhin - 56 Gnome Necro (Project 1999, Retired) <Divinity>
Contributor: Project 1999 Wiki Ravhin incedo'Marduk - 60 Human Paladin (Live on E'ci, 1999-2001) <Destinati Conquerers> | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
12-07-2010, 02:24 PM
|
|||
|
You should get a copy of their public db, and compare most npcs versus their exact allakhazam information. You will notice its exactly the same.. meaning, robots populated it, or I hope they did.
After changing thousands... of entries, I refuse to recognize that as a reference of something that research was put into. | ||
|
|
|||
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
