Do Not Engage: Warriors Vs. PALs/SHDs

[Meldor]

Originally Posted by Estu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Right. I'm not terribly concerned about blue cons; generally in a full EXP group you wanna be taking a good deal of even and higher cons anyway, although I can't speak to the higher-level situation as I don't know the camps (I've only grouped for extended periods of time in Crushbone and Unrest). If the mob is pinging around I think that's indicative of a problem. Not saying you're a bad tank, but at that point the warrior either has other people taking damage or the warrior needs to tell everyone else to wait on DPS - in either case, my original question applies.

That's not a problem.. stop with your WoW mentality.. back on live 12 years ago you had to wait for your tanks to build aggro and it's the same now.

You guys are soo freaking carebears now a day... play smart play with skills, if your a dps and YOU pick aggro YOU are the problem. Yes Sk/Pal got it easier for aggro but in the other hand Warrior have more HP / AC and skills then Hybrid tanks.

So be smart.

[Estu]

Originally Posted by Meldor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That's not a problem.. stop with your WoW mentality.. back on live 12 years ago you had to wait for your tanks to build aggro and it's the same now.

You guys are soo freaking carebears now a day... play smart play with skills, if your a dps and YOU pick aggro YOU are the problem. Yes Sk/Pal got it easier for aggro but in the other hand Warrior have more HP / AC and skills then Hybrid tanks.

So be smart.

Wow, you douche. Just because I'm interested in questions of efficiency doesn't mean I have a "WoW mentality". Grow up.

[Meldor]

Originally Posted by Estu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wow, you douche. Just because I'm interested in questions of efficiency doesn't mean I have a "WoW mentality". Grow up.

I might be a douche but you are a freaking noobs, Go back to Wow

[Nakara]

Originally Posted by Meldor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I might be a douche but you are a freaking noobs, Go back to Wow

you can't even speak English

[Dantes]

English is for newbs. Go back to WoW.

[Kich]

Go back to WoW.

Sippin' on the haterade much?

[knottyb0y]

Nice. Are SKs and PALs very unpopular in Kunark and Velious, then, or do they also have nice bonuses?

As far as i understand SKs and PAL are still necessary in Kunark. They also get gear upgrades, but Kunark really made pure melee's shine the most (with biggest gear upgrades and balancing factors).

I still imagine that SKs and Pal will do a lot of off-tanking duty during raids.

As far as exp grouping goes I think your reputation as a good player, or at least enjoyable player > how much better or worse your class is at tanking than another. Unless it prohibits me from doing content I've never rejected a class (particularly a tank) to join my group, especially if I have grouped with them before and they did not suck.

Kunark really just brings a lot of upgrades all around and a lot of fixes/features for pure melee classes. Does that mean that Warriors suck in classic? No. But taunt IS broken, and the classic gear gap between knights and warriors is not as pronounced, making knights seem more desirable for grouping at least on paper.