Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-31-2014, 04:36 PM
Glenzig Glenzig is offline
Planar Protector

Glenzig's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,557
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
its not so much wiether they are portrated poorly in 1 game vs 10 games.. its that in the vast majority of story driven games, they are portrayed poorly.

If you dont agree, you simply dont play video games... or just dont understand the issue at all.

I think this video is worth watching from start to finish, there is no reason to disagree with it becuse if you disagree with it you just simply do not understand the issue, once again.

The questions Anita Sarkeesian raises about games and the stories behind them are valid and challange game developers to make games better.

Im a man and I dont like the bullshit way women are portrate din games, becuse its just totally unbelievable (as in its not even close to reality) and it makes me look at a game as a play toy for a stupid kid or retard.. I want to play games that take shit seroiusly, putting a 36DD chick in a g string and ploppin gher down in the front of a midevil army is just stupid. If you disagree, you're stupid.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5i_RPr9DwMA

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Games should be better than this for fucks sake, its been like 30 years..
You're right, I don't play video games very much. I'm a grown up. And as such I realize that the portrayal of anything in video games is unrealistic. That's kind of the point of video games. Am I to assume that all the musclebound butt kicking male protagonists are a reflection of the current male culture?
  #2  
Old 10-31-2014, 04:53 PM
iruinedyourday iruinedyourday is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're right, I don't play video games very much. I'm a grown up. And as such I realize that the portrayal of anything in video games is unrealistic. That's kind of the point of video games. Am I to assume that all the musclebound butt kicking male protagonists are a reflection of the current male culture?
thats like saying the point of movies is to be unrealistic.

The point of video games are to be video games.. if you arnt bothered by naked chicks fighting dragons, then you arnt going to be bothered by normal chicks fighting dragons..

hell as an adult, you may even play more games in that case.

Anita challenges game devs, that doesn't mean she is god and creating rules that say games have to be one way.. she calls people out for being dipshits.

and there are a lot of dipshits in the video game industry... especially big budget AAA games, which are her primary targets...

Arguing that games that take women seriously because they are trying to tell a real interactive story, are not better than a game that is trying to tell an interactive story about men saving chicks in bikini's is like saying that 2001 isnt a better film than You've got Mail...

And if the film industry agree's that 2001 is a better flim than Grownups 2, doesn't mean that people arnt going to make Grownups 2.. if you like that shit, someones going to make it.

Anita just wants the AAA games to be looked at more critically. Because she, like many other gamers, wants better games.

As far as gamergate goes, by simply reading the posts of the people here who support it, you can see that they make up their entire argument form start to finish, with accusations about what gamergate is, by just making up their own news stories - like X spelt with Y for good reviews, even when it never happened.

the gamergate movment is 100% delusional children.
  #3  
Old 10-31-2014, 05:02 PM
Glenzig Glenzig is offline
Planar Protector

Glenzig's Avatar

Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 1,557
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
thats like saying the point of movies is to be unrealistic.

The point of video games are to be video games.. if you arnt bothered by naked chicks fighting dragons, then you arnt going to be bothered by normal chicks fighting dragons..

hell as an adult, you may even play more games in that case.

Anita challenges game devs, that doesn't mean she is god and creating rules that say games have to be one way.. she calls people out for being dipshits.

and there are a lot of dipshits in the video game industry... especially big budget AAA games, which are her primary targets...

Arguing that games that take women seriously because they are trying to tell a real interactive story, are not better than a game that is trying to tell an interactive story about men saving chicks in bikini's is like saying that 2001 isnt a better film than You've got Mail...

And if the film industry agree's that 2001 is a better flim than Grownups 2, doesn't mean that people arnt going to make Grownups 2.. if you like that shit, someones going to make it.

Anita just wants the AAA games to be looked at more critically. Because she, like many other gamers, wants better games.

As far as gamergate goes, by simply reading the posts of the people here who support it, you can see that they make up their entire argument form start to finish, with accusations about what gamergate is, by just making up their own news stories - like X spelt with Y for good reviews, even when it never happened.

the gamergate movment is 100% delusional children.
So what you're saying is what I already assumed. There is zero point for either side expending this much energy on this crap. Because it isn't actually going to change anything in a substantive way.
  #4  
Old 10-31-2014, 05:14 PM
iruinedyourday iruinedyourday is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So what you're saying is what I already assumed. There is zero point for either side expending this much energy on this crap. Because it isn't actually going to change anything in a substantive way.
well, to be fair, Anita is a prominent member and consultant in the indi game community. She performs talks at GDC and during other trade shows that game developers go to, she was given an achievement award at the last GDC awards, that she helps to organize.

She is definitely not wasting her time and the powers that be, the directors and writers and other developers hold her in high regard. They listen to her.

But gamergate is absolutely wasting there time, yes. Heh, however they have ample time to spare so... no real loss for them.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:17 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.