![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
Okay Unbrella is right, sort of.
Increasing Variance will not stop poopsocking. It will just further alienate Class R guilds. Class C continues to sock with long windows, as was evidence of the raid scene a year ago. Decrease Variance will only stop poopsocking if we can work together to make a palletable raid scene:
So... If we cannot have Respawns, tell me what is bad about the above.
__________________
| ||
|
Last edited by Daldaen; 10-30-2014 at 05:41 PM..
|
|
||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
Poopsocking is a symptom of the windows. If people can agree to number in zone/tagging and the time spent on those trackers/taggers is drastically reduced. You'll see far more guilds competing, and less poopsocking (because aforementioned agreement). If we do the agreement, and variance isn't reduced, it may help Taken/BDA. But I'm not sure who else would enter the fray with 1 tracker, 2 taggers for a 16 hour window.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
hello i'm cucumbers
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
Its certainly worth a closer look, and I would love to see some footage of races outside of VP bc some zones would be a cluster F to race tru | |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
Looks pretty good to me. I'd say not a 2 week suspension. Maybe the guild has to sit out the next FFA cycle of that mob. If they make a mistake on one they can't compete on the next. We can probably push it to two if you feel that is too light.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|