Raid Rule Madness

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The same raid force cannot track with more than two trackers. When FE/IB raided together, they had to abide by those same rules. Taken and BDA became one raid force when BDA jumped on Taken's Nagafen. BDA and Taken killed that dragon together. It's not difficult to understand.

It's not difficult to understand that you're just being difficult. You're clearly whining because you perceive all pixels as being the exclusive property of TMO. It's not true, though, and sometimes people are just willing to help:

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

helping to kill a naggy is not against the rules. that's what TMO has been doing wrong all along here. try to help other players for once instead of indiscriminately shitting all over them.

This is still applicable.

No rules were broken.

[Hitpoint]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No rules were broken.

Sounds like something to take up with the GMs. I wouldn't bother though. Logic and reasoning should suffice. One raid force killed a mob using more than two trackers. There's no way to argue anything else. One naggy is not a harsh punishment. It's probably best to leave it alone.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Logic and reasoning should suffice.

logic would say that you'd concede the point because you have no proof that taken was wiping, but you seem to have thrown logic out the window, haven't you?

[Hitpoint]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

logic would say that you'd concede the point because you have no proof that taken was wiping, but you seem to have thrown logic out the window, haven't you?

Irrelevant again. It doesn't and never did matter whether taken was wiping. Did or didn't bad help them kill naggy?

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Irrelevant again. It doesn't and never did matter whether taken was wiping. Did or didn't bad help them kill naggy?

not irrelevant. how do you know that BDA wasn't just being friendly to help them finish the mob after they knew Taken wasn't going to wipe? the best part about having competition is to be friendly after you know you've lost. we all know that TMO is incapable of actual friendly competition, though.

and friendly competition is NOT against the rules, and if it is, the rule REALLY needs to be changed before velious drops because i don't really see the harm in tagging a faction hit when someone is already killing tormax/dain/yelinak.

by the way, you should really leave the lying and the spinning to piggles and retardi. you seem really bad at it. TMO must really be hurting for PR people if you've all they've got any more. why isn't dumbrella in here to defend this himself?

[Hitpoint]

Originally Posted by Samoht [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

not irrelevant. how do you know that BDA wasn't just being friendly to help them finish the mob after they knew Taken wasn't going to wipe? the best part about having competition is to be friendly after you know you've lost. we all know that TMO is incapable of actual friendly competition, though.

and friendly competition is NOT against the rules, and if it is, the rule REALLY needs to be changed before velious drops because i don't really see the harm in tagging a faction hit when someone is already killing tormax/dain/yelinak.

by the way, you should really leave the lying and the spinning to piggles and retardi. you seem really bad at it. TMO must really be hurting for PR people if you've all they've got any more. why isn't dumbrella in here to defend this himself?

I don't have a problem with friendly competition. I'm just explaining what happened and why it happened.

[Samoht]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't have a problem with friendly competition. I'm just explaining what happened and why it happened.

no, at this point, you're assumed to be lying because you won't post the proof that what you say is even true, and you just divert or redirect every time you're asked only further cementing the assumption that you are in fact a liar.

[Troubled]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't have a problem with friendly competition. I'm just explaining what happened and why it happened.

Lol