Quote:
Originally Posted by Pringles
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just be adults, we all are - perhaps try acting like it?
|
That's not the issue. Petitions will be created. This question is how may they be most fairly and efficiently handled.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Juntsie
Fireza have no evidence dat procedure above is classic. It not classic. Juntsie move to dismiss cuz no evidence that classic and that element of essential ting on server. Dis simple, direct argument should win, cuz "not classic" argument win most of time. It should win here, too, cuz game Everquest and not LitigationQuest.
|
We are not facing an objective situation where all "not classic" items are outright rejected (I still dispute that this, a mere communicative forum procedure, is somehow not classic). The GMs here control policy subject to their own designs; I am appealing to them to adopt a formal procedure.
By this logic, just about every project 1999 procedure currently in place would need to be tossed. This is not a realistic view.
08-15-2014, 05:49 PM
Hybrid Mode
