NSFW Not Safe For World - Shock and Awe?

[DeruIsLove]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Isn't that the same logic that religious extremists use? Not a real hard or deep question.

Logic and religious extremists do not being in the same sentence. Not a real hard or deep concept.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by DeruIsLove [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Logic and religious extremists do not being in the same sentence. Not a real hard or deep concept.

Ok. So that's the same reasoning that they use though isn't it?

[DeruIsLove]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok. So that's the same reasoning that they use though isn't it?

No, not at all. Stop trying to assert that it is.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by DeruIsLove [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, not at all. Stop trying to assert that it is.

Its not? I thought that they, from their point of view, were righteous in killing anyone who is worsening the world from their point of view. They are of course not justified in this, but I'm wondering how it would be justifiable to use the same reasoning to do away with them? I'm not asserting anything btw. It just is what it is.

[DeruIsLove]

You keep saying 'reasoning' as if these animals are capable of reason.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by DeruIsLove [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You keep saying 'reasoning' as if these animals are capable of reason.

So in other words you're uncomfortable with your own answer to the question and that's why you keep sidestepping it.

[DeruIsLove]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So in other words you're uncomfortable with your own answer to the question and that's why you keep sidestepping it.

That is what you keep implying, yes.