![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
Hows this:
The Guild that killed OoA last weekend and is refusing to admit to it comes forward, admits to killing it, and promises to cut it out. Then I can see about what we can do to get things back in order. Right now you have absolutely no leg to stand on telling me that the same Guild that killed overseer last week behind everyone's backs won't just do it again. That's the rub. Get them to come forward and some GM enforcement behind the agreement in regards to the overseer and then we can look at moving forward. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
Eventually Taken is going to have to stop hiding behind the idea of gm enforcement, the staff is busy and they have no desire to police the server any more than they already do. The last agreement was largely a success and did not require any staff involvement. Maybe someone will spaz out again in 3 weeks and kill all the overseers again but why will that matter if multiple parties benefit from the agreement before that happens? All the extra stipulations and requirements y'all are piling on is doing nothing but further stalling our progress. The only rule we need is don't kill OoA, the server staff shouldn't even have the right to tell a guild they can't kill a mob in sky if they want to, that's outrageous. If a guild doesn't want to agree to preserving OoA then just come out and own your stance, nobody is buying what you're selling.
__________________
Pint
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
we were told if we could come to an agreement that they would enforce it. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Pint
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|