attention RL info posting nerds

[Tiggles]

Originally Posted by Duckwalk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you read more carefully, I stated I would start by banning all account the RMTer ever logged on to regardless of number of times they accessed the account.

So called innocent accounts shouldn't be protected as they knowingly violated the server rules regarding account sharing.

As far as how I would improve upon the manner in which RMT is combatted by the staff I can't comment further than what was already shared by staff (and previous staff) in this thread although if they want some help try are welcome to PM me.

Might be fun and the GM's could potentially out source some of their workload by providing limited tools which would allow specified members from all guilds to police each other.

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Guilds policing each other for RMT? Oh man you're right, that would be fun!!!

You can do it yourself. As much shit I talk TMO knows I'm a white knight when it comes to cheating, If I see a guildmate using MQ or RMTing i'll be the first person to get them bant.

It's bad for the server in the eyes of Sony and it's bad for the economy. If I had proof of umbrella RMTing I would hand it over in a heartbeat.

[Ambrotos]

Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Accounts may be freely shared here.

They can be freely shared, since the staff can't enforce people not sharing accounts. Yet any action taken on those accounts outside of 2boxing, also sticks with that account. It doesn't matter who did it.

Very rarely does a "innocent" account escape punishment.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by Duckwalk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Already have access to IPs and global trades (I have no clue what other tools devs may have)?

But imagine how clean the server would be if we had Chest investigating TMO and Lite investigating Nihilium (and vice versa).

Whistles so clean Tiggles could eat his hot pockets off them.

I hope you're joking.

[Duckwalk]

And its also explicitly stated thry they don't reccomend sharing accounts and that you do so at your own risk. You are responsible for your account at all times.

[Tiggles]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I hope you're joking.

I hope so, Hotpockets are gross.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by Tiggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I hope so, Hotpockets are gross.

Diarrhea pockets.

[Duckwalk]

Originally Posted by Glenzig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I hope you're joking.

I'm joking only to an extent. I think outsourcing investigation duties to certain players with high play times and an vested interest in uncovering RMT violations could be an interesting solution provided they had a limited Dev tool kit and exactly zero ability to affect the game outside of recording logs and developing evidence.

*Disclaimer: I am not a programmer, I have no clue what this would entail. Yes, Derubael i have no clue what im talkig about. You asked for ideas so I'm throwing them out.

[Detoxx]

Whos Duckwalk?

[Fael]

Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That was old TMO... new TMO would just claim the trainer was acting as an individual and deguild him temporarily.

The sad thing is you actually believe what you think.

For several months now there has been a long history of forgoing the raid mob that day plus the next one if any type of negligence occurs during an engagement. Your attempt to jam the incident with dinacarl into the scenario provided by ambrotos is glaringly weak seeing as there was no raid encounter to forgo.

Loraens idea that a raid offense is determined by the entity trained not by the identity trainer is also equally devoid of logic, and cannot be found within any concept contrived and recognize by men who make a living making and accepting arguments such as principles of Vicarious liability, agency, or negligent entrustment. Your best bet is under a theory of control via your boy unbrella; but suspicion is not a substitute for evidence.

Thank god none of you are able to sit on a jury .... Wait ... Fuck us all.

Dolic

[quido]

Originally Posted by Ambrotos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Naw. People want to keep the blinders on and forget the fact Jeremy was fucking around in Trak's lair and agroed trakanon onto bda logging on/sitting at the rock. If anything I could have done better was given Jeremy a vacation and told tmo they can't attempt Trakanon and not sit there for 2 fucking hours trying to get a hold of anyone else on staff while giving Jeremy the benefit of doubt to try and wiggle out of his fuck up.

Today's standard would be no no trak then, or next spawn. I guess you can say I ruled in favor of tmo in that case by going soft on them.

Grats tmo staff favoritism.

Once again Ambrotos is so stupid he doesn't even remember what happened, and once again he fills that void with unquestionable TMO guilt.

No wonder this dude isn't on staff.