Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Screenshots

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-24-2010, 03:57 PM
taxi2 taxi2 is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 53
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ridiuz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Come on now... I understand the limitations of only being able to pvp, and group with people of your own faction. But atleast you didn't have to worry about getting your gear jacked from you when you got PK'd. Dude from 6-30 my cleric was almost full cloth with some crappy earings/rings that I didn't mind if they got jacked. After I hit 30 I spent an ENTIRE month in Skyshrine camping Guardian Armor because it was No Drop. Do you think dying and losing experience was reason to rage enough? Try getting PK'd and losing your brand new chest piece you bought for 500pp! lol

Man I was a pro when it came to bagging my gear when a PK was kicking my ass. Now Rallos Zek is a real mans server where you seperate the boys from the men. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I rolled a toon first on Sullon. Ill take losing a piece of gear and having to try to find no drop gear any day of the week over getting corpse camped by a lvl45 wizard in Blackburrow, which is what happened to me and made me switch to RZ. RZ was cool as hell but lets not kid ourselves here, SZ was much harder to play on.

As for Pk/anti-pk its simple. View it as "good vs evil". I was an Anti-pk. That doesnt mean i didnt pvp. It meant that guilds like flowers of happiness were KOS to me. I had that list people talked about. Someone killed or attempted to kill me, he was then added to the KOS list. I had plenty of people to kill only days after starting out so again its not like anti-pk meant anti-pvp.
Last edited by taxi2; 09-24-2010 at 04:00 PM..
  #2  
Old 09-24-2010, 06:25 PM
loneless999 loneless999 is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 268
Default

i remember this was in the bazaar was chatting in the serverwide necro channel and someone said RZ were doing sleeper so i joined another channel filled with people all wetting them selves over the fact he might be killed and what he might drop was exiting

on a side note there must have been some people casting rain spells over sleeper for fun
and people setteling some scores getting him hits in on other players
  #3  
Old 09-24-2010, 06:45 PM
Japan Japan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: las vegas, nv
Posts: 247
Default

Anti-PKs were probably the best thing about RZ. I doubt we're going to see a PK vs anti-PK dynamic like that in MMO gaming ever again, unfortunately.
  #4  
Old 10-12-2011, 07:09 PM
Djanis Djanis is offline
Orc


Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taxi2 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I rolled a toon first on Sullon. Ill take losing a piece of gear and having to try to find no drop gear any day of the week over getting corpse camped by a lvl45 wizard in Blackburrow, which is what happened to me and made me switch to RZ. RZ was cool as hell but lets not kid ourselves here, SZ was much harder to play on.

As for Pk/anti-pk its simple. View it as "good vs evil". I was an Anti-pk. That doesnt mean i didnt pvp. It meant that guilds like flowers of happiness were KOS to me. I had that list people talked about. Someone killed or attempted to kill me, he was then added to the KOS list. I had plenty of people to kill only days after starting out so again its not like anti-pk meant anti-pvp.
Sullon came out after the prime time of Rallos had come and gone. I played on both, and I don't think it was harder on SZ. SZ already had preset territory and teammates (whether you wanted them on your team or not) right from the get go. Everybody was a potential enemy on RZ. I think original RZ was the hardest, although I'm sure it can be debated forever. One thing is for sure, safe zones ruined pvp for everyone, no matter what server you were on.

Lots of old names in this thread. Brings back some memories. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #5  
Old 10-12-2011, 10:59 PM
SoulLeech SoulLeech is offline
Scrawny Gnoll


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Djanis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sullon came out after the prime time of Rallos had come and gone.
Certainly.

The concentrate that was Rallos that had been thoroughly diluted before Sullon popped up in 2001. By that time, that players, guilds and feuds that had funneled together into Rallos from UO, M59 and wherever else had already dispersed to TZ/VZ, left for AC, turned blue or sat anticipating DAoC.

That was the great thing about Rallos in the spring/summer of '99, the group of players it forcibly brought together. It was playing in a league where every third player was a past or future hall of famer.

Without those players what did you have?

A decent standalone PvE work with PVP tacked on as an afterthough that became a game about grinding between raids with PVP as a complete orphan.

Sullon was actually the ultimate confirmation of that fact. A physical manifestation of the admission that PVP was broken, they weren't going to fix it and they were fed up with hearing about it.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:15 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.