Freedom From Atheism Foundation

[dreama1]

Originally Posted by Ikonoclastia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I disagree. You have to define what a 'god' is. If as some people suspect and there is some evidence to show its possible, that we are in a computer simulation, then the creator of that simulation would be akin to a god.

That we're ignorant of how its possible for a particle to spontaneously appear out of nowhere or to exist at different places at the same time which really goes against all our ideas of normal matter and reality shows us that we can't assume even more spectacular mysteries exist.

We still have no idea what and where dark matter and dark energy are and is? There are lots of mysteries still. Claiming "there is no god" without evidence of 'no god' or claiming "there is a god" without evidence of a god are the same. Ignorant of our limitations and lack of understanding of the universe.

You can have an opinion, but you cannot claim to have the knowledge just yet.

The point is you cannot, as you are claiming, use the possibility of something existing as evidence for that existing. The null hypothesis in society which is completely fucking retarded is that there is a god. There is no supernatural phenomenon, just supernatural interpretations of phenomenon, i.e., including 'god'.