![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
Rangers = classic Beastlords = Not P99 = classic Not sure if I get your point. Rangers don't need special attention to add - granted I am not a programmer, but I assume a headache would be adding Beastlords to all the gear, quests, zones, etc. that are out there except for Vah Shir since they won't be available. Plus making quests for gear in zones they might not have them... I don't think Velious gear was added for Beastlords after Luclin came out, or PoSky - don't quote me on that but you know people would complain about not having quest gear. There is a reason they aren't adding Luclin and anything else after, because it was the begining of the suck for EQ at that expansion, and everything else after was a little shittier until all that is left is the shitball that EQLive is today. Topping everything off, the Beastlord class added no real value to EQ, at least zerkers are great DPS after mass AA's, but Beastlords just sit there and suck. The argument of adding them in cause it doesn't hurt is not really valid. | |||
|
Last edited by Savard18; 09-20-2010 at 06:04 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
yeah i agree with that point more, considering the headache of having to find all the beastlord quests/etc to add that were backadded into classic/kun/vel, probably a huuuuuge pita
i dont care if theyre added or not, just the other arguments people were making against it had nothing to stand on other than nouuuuuu itz not classic | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|