DA Peoples Party

[UncleDread]

Both Transcendence and DA are both awful nnoob guild so could we please close his post?Not worth the text space.[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Supreme]

Originally Posted by Reiker [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I remember a time when Transcendence kept begging Divinity to merge with them, but Divinity refused... hmm...

really...

I remember hearing about a "merger" through the community and shot it down as it circumvented our recruiting process and did not represent Transcendence. As i recall (looking at the old discussion) Divinity would have had to apply to join just like anyone else and follow the same recruiting standards just like everyone else for it to have happened at all. Divinity refused that.

Divinity is a FINE guild and i have alot of respect for them and for what they have accomplished.

Originally Posted by UncleDread [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Both Transcendence and DA are both awful nnoob guild so could we please close his post?Not worth the text space.[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your post , while new and nonconstructive, seems to show that you are part of a guild that has limited or no dealings with Transcendence or DA.

So screw you.

[Rhalous]

I had less of a role in the guild at the time of the "supposed merger", but I can tell you that Daydrem brought it to our attention and we as a guild decided we wanted to progress through the game with a Divinity tag. We even lost a few great players because of our decision. I'm not trying to monger anything, just stating how we felt about it at the time. There was certainly a lot going on behind the scenes at this time, and because I wasn't an officer until about a week or so after this, I wasn't involved in any officer discussion.

[Supreme]

Originally Posted by Rhalous [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I had less of a role in the guild at the time of the "supposed merger", but I can tell you that Daydrem brought it to our attention and we as a guild decided we wanted to progress through the game with a Divinity tag. We even lost a few great players because of our decision. I'm not trying to monger anything, just stating how we felt about it at the time. There was certainly a lot going on behind the scenes at this time, and because I wasn't an officer until about a week or so after this, I wasn't involved in any officer discussion.

This was more what i heard from Divinity at the time. When i came back and reformed Transcendence there were still SEVERAL people from divinity that was dual tagged into Transcendence.



However, What DA has done is QUITE communist. Lets just all form one huge socialist system!

[Trimm]

Originally Posted by Supreme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This was more what i heard from Divinity at the time. When i came back and reformed Transcendence there were still SEVERAL people from divinity that was dual tagged into Transcendence.

I'm not sure what you are going for here, but please leave us out of it. Yes, we did a few joint raids in the early days but that is the extent of it. The idea was tossed around of merging the guilds, but Trans wanted to be under their guild tag. The idea didn't seem like something we wanted to do, so we declined. No drama, no arguments.

As far as I know, Not a single Divinity member has ever left to join Trans. If one has, I'm unaware of it. If anything, they have left to join IB. No disrespect or anything to Trans, but saying we were under a 'dual tag' is incorrect. You did your thing, we did ours, and we joined up a few times for Fear and MM is all. Rogean or Nilbog asked if we were raiding with Trans during the GM event in Qeynos, and we said no. From then on we were recognized as one of the 'Big 3'.