What's the story on Avatars and Signatures?

[myriverse]

Originally Posted by August [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The problem here is that NSFW is basically a cess pit that I don't care anything about. However, I do care about signatures and avatars, especially when they contain information that I would like - such as links to resources, character information about a poster, or just funny to look at sigs. By opting out, I have to opt out of more than JUST NSFW sigs/avatars.

And again, we ban nudity / NSFW stuff from every corner of this forum except for the NSFW forum. Why is there an exception to sigs/avatars?

There is no exception. What we have here is a disagreement over what is NSFW. IMO, any NSFW avatars and sigs get dealt with very quickly. A couple of breasts in a bathing suit will never, ever be NSFW.

If your opinion is different, then take steps to restrict your content. Simple problem. Simple solution.

Originally Posted by Faerie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I wish they required us to post in character all the time. If they did that then I'd support no suggestive sigs/avatars. But since they don't it's whatever.

How the heck would that work when many have 20-odd characters? Holy schizoid!

And some characters might even be more debauched.