Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-19-2014, 01:51 PM
Crede Crede is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,297
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Enchanters for example were really almost never talked about as a solo class. .
I played live for many years, and always thought enchanters were strictly grouping. Heck, the P99 wiki even says, "Enchanters are a powerful class, but often rely upon a group to reach their full potential".

It wasn't until P99 that I realized they could solo from the forums of Tecmos posting 1 million pp that he soloed and Lorean's Solo Artist Challenge.

Overall though, for me I would attribute the easiness to a internet connection much faster than dial up and a computer that actually can run EQ along with having access to Wiki/Forums/Maps whenever I want online. Couldn't alt-tab before. You just have to find more ways to challenge yourself. HS is still no cake walk. Use less numbers, it's usually more fun/challenging that way.
  #2  
Old 02-19-2014, 09:22 PM
Brocktree Brocktree is offline
Skeleton


Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 19
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crede [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I played live for many years, and always thought enchanters were strictly grouping. Heck, the P99 wiki even says, "Enchanters are a powerful class, but often rely upon a group to reach their full potential".

It wasn't until P99 that I realized they could solo from the forums of Tecmos posting 1 million pp that he soloed and Lorean's Solo Artist Challenge.

Overall though, for me I would attribute the easiness to a internet connection much .
To be fair I really think charm is more reliable here. I played an enchanter main for original release > kunark. I agree people did not charm solo much unless there was a huge pull and kind of "oh shit" moment when you had nothing to lose. I have no proof so maybe it's just that people have the strategy down and stack more cha etc. etc. I definitely remember enchanters getting yelled at for charming mobs in group situations by the rest of the party because it was "too dangerous"
  #3  
Old 02-19-2014, 11:15 PM
Vexenu Vexenu is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,244
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brocktree [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
To be fair I really think charm is more reliable here. I played an enchanter main for original release > kunark. I agree people did not charm solo much unless there was a huge pull and kind of "oh shit" moment when you had nothing to lose. I have no proof so maybe it's just that people have the strategy down and stack more cha etc. etc. I definitely remember enchanters getting yelled at for charming mobs in group situations by the rest of the party because it was "too dangerous"
This is what I remember as well. And really, if you think about it, if you made charm unreliable you'd take the Enchanter from being the godlike class it is now to being simply a powerful and indispensable grouping class that provides buffs, CC and a weak pet. Which actually sounds like a balanced class compared to the Enchanter class on P1999 that can do all those things in addition to having a monster DPS and tank pet. I just remember Enchanters being desired for their CC and buffs back in the day, I don't remember much charming at all. I can't imagine that people wouldn't have figured out how to abuse charm back then if it stuck as well as it does here, which makes me believe that charm definitely was much more unreliable back then.
  #4  
Old 02-19-2014, 11:28 PM
fastboy21 fastboy21 is offline
Planar Protector

fastboy21's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vexenu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is what I remember as well. And really, if you think about it, if you made charm unreliable you'd take the Enchanter from being the godlike class it is now to being simply a powerful and indispensable grouping class that provides buffs, CC and a weak pet. Which actually sounds like a balanced class compared to the Enchanter class on P1999 that can do all those things in addition to having a monster DPS and tank pet. I just remember Enchanters being desired for their CC and buffs back in the day, I don't remember much charming at all. I can't imagine that people wouldn't have figured out how to abuse charm back then if it stuck as well as it does here, which makes me believe that charm definitely was much more unreliable back then.
Charming was always OP. Fewer ppl did it back on live because the prevailing popular play strats were to be safe and conservative. There are many many many more people on p99 that are risk takers than there were on live.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:21 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.