Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 01-21-2014, 05:28 PM
Yibz Yibz is offline
Kobold

Yibz's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Writ3r [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just like someone would go out into a busy highway because they see traffic would apply the same to someone NOT training because they see a raid force that they may effect...



I know the mechanics of the zone and encounters. If you aggro a golem or draco the cycle begins it doesn't necessarily begin with who aggro'd it as Aeolwind pointed out isn't within the script. From what i also understand is the cycle is currently not operating like it should, which is why CT has rapid DT's upon engage.

If you read what i wrote i didn't banish your strategy at all. However, as you know from what you said and Rogean's quote you ran the risk of getting punished by your own actions. There isn't set in stone the fact that you HAVE to train in order to succeed there, it's all in the choice of tactic.

If you feel there aren't many places to train especially with other people in zone, then use a different tactic or you run the risk of punishment with these new rules.
Kiter that aggro'd CT/golem/draco is always the first person to get DTd. There's no such thing as a DT cycle. It hasn't worked that way for months.
  #52  
Old 01-21-2014, 05:29 PM
Sirken Sirken is offline
VIP / Contributor

Sirken's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,822
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reguiy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
My bad. I forgot about nilbog's desire to see corpses littered across Norrath.
no worries, thats why im here [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Ever wonder what Braknar does around here? - https://youtu.be/WTtFXBgggpI

Sirken's Twitch Stream - www.twitch.tv/sirken_

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uthgaard View Post
Accusing me of simultaneous favoritism for two opposing guilds involves a special kind of stupid
Quote:
Originally Posted by karsten View Post
going after sirken is like going to a cheerleader convention and punching the only one that bothered to talk to you
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean View Post
I've met Sirken IRL.. he ain't jelly of shit

  #53  
Old 01-21-2014, 05:40 PM
Yibz Yibz is offline
Kobold

Yibz's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 105
Default

I did avoid them.
  #54  
Old 01-21-2014, 05:42 PM
HeallunRumblebelly HeallunRumblebelly is offline
Planar Protector

HeallunRumblebelly's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Roanoke, Indiana
Posts: 1,353
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Writ3r [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
CT of course cause whoever engages him first gets DT'd.

Also, what you're saying is currently whoever engages Draco or a golem at all receives a DT now?

Not having done it in the few months you mentioned myself, i have went off of what others said (members of your guild and others) in regards to those DTs seem to get stored on CT instead of actually going throughout the zone. Which is why CT has extra engage DTs.

Regardless, I know you have the experience which is why it is a little shocking you couldn't avoid them better.
Thing is, ct / draco / golems are to the right (east?) of the portal and to the north, your guild is going to sit up north, if you go only northwest you're not going to have room to avoid casters n such and lead in a wide enough circle (hard to keep em all 100% together). Need some area in SW, which is fine if they were on the wall--I'm guessing the pullers interacted with the train in some way and it all went pear shaped from there.
  #55  
Old 01-21-2014, 05:43 PM
Babayaaga Babayaaga is offline
Aviak

Babayaaga's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 91
Default

How hard would it be to remove old posts with rulesets that no longer apply?

Seems a pretty simple solution, no?
__________________

Blue: (Inactive)
Pinoit Pumpie, Elleyne
<Bregan D'Aerth>

TAKProject: (Inactive)
Marshmallow Staypuffed, Pinoit, Pinot, Piia, Dahria, Freyja, Inaera, Naga, Bhut, Mata

Green: (Inactive)
Echofreya
<Black Lotus>

Formerly:
Babayaaga Danaeis, Ellyn Danaeis
~Xegony
  #56  
Old 01-21-2014, 05:44 PM
Yibz Yibz is offline
Kobold

Yibz's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 105
Default

Do you have a clue what you're talking about?

There's a reason for the disconnect between the way Sirken, Deurbael, TMO and IB/FE view the situation and the way the casual horde & Rogean are viewing it.

Hint: one of these groups has been to a competetive CT raid in the last 2 years.
  #57  
Old 01-21-2014, 05:45 PM
Kagatob Kagatob is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Gensokyo
Posts: 792
Default

Our you know, have someone besides Jeremy stating that they no longer apply.
  #58  
Old 01-21-2014, 05:54 PM
Erati Erati is offline
Planar Protector

Erati's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 4,561
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yibz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Do you have a clue what you're talking about?

There's a reason for the disconnect between the way Sirken, Deurbael, TMO and IB/FE view the situation and the way the casual horde & Rogean are viewing it.

Hint: one of these groups has been to a competetive CT raid in the last 2 years.
elites gonna elite
  #59  
Old 01-21-2014, 05:57 PM
Yibz Yibz is offline
Kobold

Yibz's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Writ3r [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I went off of the fact Rogean himself (the owner of this entire thing with content creator Nilbog) said he was there watching with his own eyes.

So if he felt the need to suspend according to the new rules, i'd assume there was wrong doing. It's obvious some disagree which is your right... but doesn't change the outcome.

Raid suspension happened to try and mend that disconnect, Rogean/Nilbog's ruleset was put in place for everyone hence why we are raiding again.
So you think I should have been suspended because of the fact that I was suspended? Maybe next time you should just say that instead of feigning critical thinking and boasting about your knowledge of incorrect game mechanics and hearsay.
  #60  
Old 01-21-2014, 06:01 PM
Raavak Raavak is offline
Planar Protector

Raavak's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Creepin' inta your back door.
Posts: 2,038
Default

One thing that begins to stand out clearly is how much the Class C guildmembers understand about EQ mechanics and how oblivious Class R guildmembers tend to be.
__________________
[60 Sorcerer] Rakpartha (Erudite)
[60 High Priest] Doktyr (Dwarf)
[45 Shadow Knight] Elandrea (Dark Elf)
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:42 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.