![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
Dolic | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
i think most proposals included some form of "sim patch day" repops
basically with Rogeans or Stealins plan the repops would serve to speed up the cycles as the repopped mob would still follow the tier it was suppose to belong to as if it had spawned normally Repops will b a part of the solution no matter what plan is decided on | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Why? Because it's the staff that has to put it in place and the staff has less to gain by how they are divided to the server. Rogean's 1/1/1 proposal (or my proposal, wtf ever) would work with repops or in conjunction with sirken's repop rules (two different rule sets).
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#5
|
|||||
|
Quote:
However, I can clearly see that what Sirken posted wasn't the solution to end the raid suspension. The suspension happened and people were told to make a new raiding proposal and to agree to it and that "we" shouldn't expect repops, variance reduced, game mechanics changed, etc in any of the plans. You guys got ahead of yourselves and thought in the end nothing had to change and you'd get free repops. Now, I have no clue why Sirken posted the raid suspension was going to be lifted, but it was clear in his Repop post that guilds needed to still work out the normal raiding details (it was stated at the bottom).
__________________
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|