Elder Scrolls Online

[Sirken]

he says it'll fail cause of the sub model? thats pretty dumb imo. its things like pay to win, and station stores that ruin games.

15$ a month is less than 4$ a week. if you dont get 4$ a week of entertainment, then dont play it.

but personally i prefer sub model > everything else ive seen

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

he says it'll fail cause of the sub model? thats pretty dumb imo. its things like pay to win, and station stores that ruin games.

Agreed, people have no problem paying for a game it won't ruin anything.

Reminds me of francis, $380 on candy crush in 1 month....

[Tecmos Deception]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

he says it'll fail cause of the sub model? thats pretty dumb imo. its things like pay to win, and station stores that ruin games.

15$ a month is less than 4$ a week. if you dont get 4$ a week of entertainment, then dont play it.

but personally i prefer sub model > everything else ive seen

That's my thoughts on subscription models. It would cost me $8 to go see a movie in my little midwestern city, with no popcorn/candy/pop, for 2 hours of watching a mediocre movie. Or I could pay twice that and be thoroughly entertained playing an MMO for an easy 40+ hours in the month.

[citizen1080]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

he says it'll fail cause of the sub model? thats pretty dumb imo. its things like pay to win, and station stores that ruin games.

15$ a month is less than 4$ a week. if you dont get 4$ a week of entertainment, then dont play it.

but personally i prefer sub model > everything else ive seen

My thoughts as well. I would much rather sub than F2P

[Swish]

Originally Posted by citizen1080 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

My thoughts as well. I would much rather sub than F2P

Originally Posted by Thugnuts [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

F2P/store games are all shit in my experience.

Except League of Legends [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] ... but you're right!

[Rust1d?]

Played quite a few f2p games and they all suck. As long as the game is good, I do not paying the sub.

[Auvdar]

Just got my email invite for the next beta wave starting Friday. I guess all my negative critism towards them paid off... or they are desperate.

Will check it out for a few hours and see if anything has changed.

[Randarn]

Sadly the f2p with stores is all about profit... the sub era is over...they just make more money when the player can buy aesthetic items. gw2, LoL. etc.

They govern to the masses and that's what they want these days. Casual playing with pretty outfits.

I say, bring on the VR....I'll pay pretty much anything lol.

[bizzum]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

he says it'll fail cause of the sub model? thats pretty dumb imo. its things like pay to win, and station stores that ruin games.

15$ a month is less than 4$ a week. if you dont get 4$ a week of entertainment, then dont play it.

but personally i prefer sub model > everything else ive seen

I remember when FFXIV did a sub model and did very well. Guy writing the article is a doofus.

[Smedy]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

he says it'll fail cause of the sub model? thats pretty dumb imo. its things like pay to win, and station stores that ruin games.

15$ a month is less than 4$ a week. if you dont get 4$ a week of entertainment, then dont play it.

but personally i prefer sub model > everything else ive seen

agreed, sub model is the only way, the pay to win is retarded