Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old 01-03-2014, 04:14 PM
Rhambuk Rhambuk is offline
Planar Protector

Rhambuk's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,034
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by koros [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
They're giving concessions they don't have to.
you make them sound generous and that casuals should be on the ground licking their boots.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haynar View Post
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Oh yea .... Piss Off.

H
  #102  
Old 01-03-2014, 04:14 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So PLEASE explain to me again how you'd like to punish casual guilds for adhering to the rules, being good citizens, and saying we refused to "compete." It's an asinine argument. We refused to stoop as low as TMO and FE therefore we (the casuals) just don't care enough. That's bullshit, and every single person on this server knows it's bullshit.

You want to wall off targets for yourselves then do so on the merit of the casuals being unable to kill said targets, oh wait the encounters are fucking easy but your sense of entitlement after months of shitting all over each other has made you blind to the rest of the server.

Fuck you, fuck all this rhetoric. It's a goddamn game and you're a bunch of grown ass children who don't know how to share. It's pathetic. I'm done posting in troll chat. If you want to fucking talk about some proposals you can post there.
Your argument would have merit if you competed and then weren't involved in training etc. You didn't even show up. Likely if you did you would have been called out many times just due to inexperience or ineptitude.

How are casuals being punished? Can you really speak to a sense of entitlement?

Your attitude is not at all conducive to a healthy raid scene.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #103  
Old 01-03-2014, 04:14 PM
Daldaen Daldaen is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kedge Keep
Posts: 9,062
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imslap [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
What you are looking for is instanced raiding. Every single game from World of Warcraft onward offers that experience. Everquest is not instanced, therefore work is required in order to experience all of the content.
What I'm looking for, is Velious.
  #104  
Old 01-03-2014, 04:14 PM
Mezzmur Mezzmur is offline
Fire Giant

Mezzmur's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In case everyone forgot, the casual guilds REFUSED to pull every dirty trick in the book to get those targets. We refused to DA stall tank, "accidentally" train, leapfrog, FTE snipe, rules lawyer, manipulate logs, ninja loot, buy up hundreds of accounts, etc etc

So PLEASE explain to me again how you'd like to punish casual guilds for adhering to the rules, being good citizens, and saying we refused to "compete." It's an asinine argument. We refused to stoop as low as TMO and FE therefore we (the casuals) just don't care enough. That's bullshit, and every single person on this server knows it's bullshit.

You want to wall off targets for yourselves then do so on the merit of the casuals being unable to kill said targets, oh wait the encounters are fucking easy but your sense of entitlement after months of shitting all over each other has made you blind to the rest of the server.

Fuck you, fuck all this rhetoric. It's a goddamn game and you're a bunch of grown ass children who don't know how to share. It's pathetic. I'm done posting in troll chat. If you want to fucking talk about some proposals you can post there.
I'd like to hear your feedback on the Sirken Hybrid. Ignore the trolls. Seriously, I don't see how it's unfair.

I realize you feel punish, but this isn't about the past, this is about now and moving forward.
__________________
Bamek Blazingbeard
  #105  
Old 01-03-2014, 04:15 PM
Rhambuk Rhambuk is offline
Planar Protector

Rhambuk's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,034
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imslap [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I, and I feel comfortably speaking for all the "hardcore players", hate variance more than you will ever understand. No one enjoys spending that much time tracking. No one enjoys waking up at 3AM to raid.

But, I (and again most "hardcore players") DO enjoy raiding and killing the mobs. If this is the name of the game, then I will put my best foot forward to win.
I know you didn't ask for the variance and it just pushed you to do ridiculous things, but its because you do those ridiculous things that the variance doesn't work.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haynar View Post
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Oh yea .... Piss Off.

H
  #106  
Old 01-03-2014, 04:16 PM
Galelor Galelor is offline
Kobold

Galelor's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 156
Default

I have read pretty much all the arguments related to the needs/wants/ideas surrounding casuals, hard cores, instances, variance, FTE, etc. Everyone has valid points, and we all want to enjoy what we love about EQ.

The only way to make everyone happy: Just leave everything close to the way it is now with some minor changes to clear up the training and also make each raid mob have an instance with a 2 week lockout timer that is guild wide and each instance only lasts 2 hours. Hard core guilds can still race for spawns and casual guilds can still get to kill content with their guild. Hard core guilds reap the rewards of 2 spawns a month via instance + competition and the casuals will actually get to raid without getting trained and shit talked to death. Everyone gets to play the game the way they enjoy it. The downside is that the Devs have to do a little work to get stuff set up and keep an eye out that instancing doesn't /pwn the server, and content is not classic in a very slight way yet it makes the game playable for everyone.

This might even push guilds into splitting up a little bit into more classic type guild sizes...

Just a thought.
  #107  
Old 01-03-2014, 04:16 PM
Mezzmur Mezzmur is offline
Fire Giant

Mezzmur's Avatar

Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mezzmur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
For those late to the party.

Take TMO/FE Proposal that was originally posted with 7 day hands off, move that to 10, move Sirken's Mob list instead of TMO/FE's, ADD Sirken's PNP, Take TMO/FE No In-game Poopsock Rules. Tier 2 can have a rotation if they want, up to them. Tier 1 attacks Tier 2 on First 10 Days, Second 20 days Tier 1 on Tier 1....... YOU GET THIS:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

100% Fair to All, Tier 2 gets MORE mobs than Tier 1, and Tier 2 can attack Tier 1 mobs on the second 20 days. Someone decide rules on how you shift tier 1 and 2. If you don't like this idea you're donkers!
__________________
Bamek Blazingbeard
  #108  
Old 01-03-2014, 04:18 PM
williestargell williestargell is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 355
Default

70%+ of the server population has agreed to Rogeans (GM proposal) - why is this not over?
  #109  
Old 01-03-2014, 04:19 PM
Fael Fael is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 617
Default

pras sirken.

Oh, and williestargell who said: "70%+ of the server population has agreed to Rogeans (GM proposal) - why is this not over?"

Rogean also said that he wants the server to agree. What would you say if the Staff gave you the choice between something like THIS proposal and going back to the way things were before? I would imagine that you would take this proposal gladly.

If staff put that as the ultimatum--put the bargaining power back where it should be as per Classic Everquest--then these negotiations would be over. The large guilds have given up more than anyone would have imagined, they can't go back on what they've offered. The only ones holding out now are the casuals who want more more more, and to destroy what makes Classic Everquest great.


Dolic
Last edited by Fael; 01-03-2014 at 04:26 PM..
  #110  
Old 01-03-2014, 04:19 PM
Bruman Bruman is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 456
Default

Hey guys, Vanilla Gods and Kunark launch content are top tier, makes sense. Nevermind that they have epics (which is mostly resolved with planar revamps in Velious).

Seriously though - VP is top tier from a content perspective. That's it. After that it's about having a raid scene that lets both styles do their thing.

Tier 1 - VP and hardcore tracking/alting/socking/whatever, go nuts
Tier 2 - Probably a rotation (or close to it) with a time limit on engaging

Not to mention - everyone but FE is behind Rogean's plan. TMO was some smaller changes made, and that's it. This is really just a circle jerk of FE and Sirken and Deru.
__________________
Monk of Bregan D'Aerth

Quote:
Originally Posted by nilbog View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruman View Post
Leapfrogging is a dick move. It's not about "rules" or "ZOMG IT HAPPENED ON MY SERVER ITS FAIR".
Truth.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:45 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.