Lock Server Until an Agreement is Met

[Elements]

Originally Posted by Yinikren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sure. My system involved the least amount of work to change from the current scene since it was just a bag limit.

Bag limit seems fine. I need 6 guilds for all my alts, probably 7 in a week or two, and 8, 9 10 soon after.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Elements [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bag limit seems fine. I need 6 guilds for all my alts, probably 7 in a week or two, and 8, 9 10 soon after.

Shitbags usually do.

[Elements]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Shitbags usually do.

Shitbag to shitbag I thanks for the support bumps.

[Fael]

Xasten speaks the truth.

These negations are entirely artificial. If you removed Rogean from the equation, then the casuals would have gladly accepted the original offers. It would have been more than their wildest dreams come true.

Then again, if you remove Rogean from the equation, TMO/FE/IB wouldn't have offered what they offered.

Each side lacks any bargaining power whatsever. The GM staff have it all, but claim to be unwilling to use it. Each side now is simply holding out in hopes that Rogean ultimately will dictate a compromise more favorable to their terms.

A forced compromise is not a compromise. Oh: and 5/9 guilds is only a majority if every guild had the same vote, power, etc. IB/FE/TMO have just as many active people as those 5 put together.

Dolic




Dolic

[derpcake]

Originally Posted by Fael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you removed Rogean from the equation, then the casuals would have gladly accepted the original offers. It would have been more than their wildest dreams come true.

Rogean, much like me I guess, wants to ensure that this server has a bright future.

Thats not done by locking out a large part of the population from raids.

Getting rid of the top 5%, is just a 5% loss. If that serves the remaining 95% of population, its a great plan.

[Yinikren]

Originally Posted by Elements [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bag limit seems fine. I need 6 guilds for all my alts, probably 7 in a week or two, and 8, 9 10 soon after.

There's your entitlement, Xasten.
In all seriousness, I get what you are saying about competing.

In my system, they compete for harder, more valuable mobs, instead of just more of them like you do now. It opens the doors for more guilds to compete, instead of what appears to scraps offered once a week.

Of course we fought for a 50/50 split. You compete with one other guild during your split. We compete with 6 in ours.