Quote:
Originally Posted by YendorLootmonkey
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I like that DA stalling is no longer a valid tactic (does having a character eat a Trak Touch with DA count as a "stall"... don't care either way, but lets address that up front.)
Still not sure the "no poopsocking" doesn't cater to guilds with alt armies, someone would have to convince me and others this isn't just "something that looks like a bone is being thrown but is really just playing to a certain guild's advantage."
Does this involve the guild council premise like the original TMO/FE proposal? If so, what guilds sit on it, how will the votes be structured, how does a guild establish representation to it, and what are the "sanctions" mentioned that guilds would be enacting on each other?
How does this scale to Velious so we're not right back at square one a few months from now? Note, I feel it would be fair for Velious to be a FFA for X months, but I am sure casuals don't want to wait for another Rogean-style intervention before they get some sort of fair access to Velious content after a certain period of time. I guess this part isn't as urgent and could maybe be tasked to the guild council prior to Velious release.
|
No guild council other than to mediate disagreements, and prevent CSR petitions.
This proposal has nothing to do with Velious and it shouldn't. 3yo Kunark is in no way comparable to Velious.
12-31-2013, 04:10 PM
Threaded Mode