![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
soulbinders were a good addition, especially during off peak hours. hell on red it can take days to get a bind for a melee.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
I never understood the hate for PoK books outside of PvP servers.
Seriously, if Rogean enabled binding in Timorous Deep for a day, half the fucking server would bind at Firepots, and the other half would bitch and moan that they couldn't play that day to get bound. People want other players to run from Field of Bone to East Commonlands, but they don't want to do it themselves (maybe past the first time).
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Current Games:
Naw | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
Where PoK is REALLY a travesty is that you don't have to go there the first time by foot. As soon as you get into PoK, the world is 2 minutes away. What used to feel like islands and continents are now just really big rooms in a mansion. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
KEI didn't make Enchanters unwanted in exp groups. From classic to... fuck, I don't even know - enchanters have been a part of the best exp/loot groups. You simply can't go wrong playing a war/cler/enc in EQ groups. Even if you took away KEI, Luclin for Enchanters brought a shitload of new AOE zones and Dire Charm for new/old playgrounds.
Quote:
What I do know is that if Nilberg enabled PoK on this server, 99% of the playerbase would be bound there. The same is true of Timorous Deep Firepots. Most of the people who complain about convenient travel would be the people using it - it's the hypocrisy that bothers me when these same people hate on Spires/PoK. People are opposed to other players getting convenient travel, but will gladly take it themselves should the opportunity present itself.
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
Hypocritical would be if a player bound at the firepots argued against opening it for other people to bind there, or someone arguing for a one-day-only period where everyone is allowed to bind there, but no one in the future will be able to. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
The option for an alcohol-free party is still there (you are not forced to use the books and can still use druids/wizards/your feet). The former alcoholic is capable of making his own party without alcohol (PoK/Spires) without sacrificing any other aspect of his party (it doesn't matter how you got to Karnor as long as you got there). It becomes an issue when the former alcoholic wants all other parties (other players not in the alcoholic's party) to not drink alcohol (people using PoK/Spires). Anyhow, that's my take on the matter. I'm not gonna derail this further than it already went.
__________________
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
soulbinders would certainly be welcome on red in my book haha
__________________
Freddi
Farson | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|