Heres your proof Sloan

[Tanthallas]

Sericx was insistent that you went to observe necrious; hence i was insistent that there should be a FE and TMO observer. Either one of us could have been feared like that; it just happened to be myself. Staying completely away from the fight does not allow for any observation and makes our presence out there completely moot. Hence after that we both agreed to just go to the zone in and not even bother observing.

My 'interference' did not cause the death of anyone or jeopardize anyones position - Sericx was screaming that I aggroed hoshkar before this as well, so it was automatic DQ, when we both know that I am not KOS to hoshkar and did nothing of the sort. Myself and you, necrious, agreed to move to the zone in and i said many times in OOC that the games would continue - that if you had any objection to that you could voice it up at that moment. Not only did you not object, as the point of this competition was a fight between Xerxes and Sericx and not the extent to which one could DQ the other, but you and me continued on to put in firmer rules on the extent to which people could /q to wipe agro, etc.

Now - if Sericx would have been adamant about calling the thing off and about us paying for the disruption that this apparent DQ caused it would have been one thing. Instead, he continued on after we both made clear that we expected everything to proceed as normal. I am not sure how he expected either you or anyone else to 'observe' in this instance if he was not opening the potential for something like this to happen. I would have gladly stayed at zone in with you if you had stayed there as well.

This post is not in the spirit that you were discussing this with me Necrious - I understand that you want to defend your guildmember, but we both know that as far as the bet was concerned, a 1v1 vs any FE or IB member in VP, Sericx lost. Holding onto a technicality is bad sportsmanship; especially one that had nothing to do with his eventual demise at Xerxes hand.