Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

View Poll Results: do you think the current VP rules are bullshit?
yes 327 68.99%
no 147 31.01%
Voters: 474. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-04-2013, 02:24 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Not true.
Prove it.


Hahaha finally got to use that line when it was relevant.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #2  
Old 08-04-2013, 02:30 AM
Heebo Heebo is offline
Fire Giant

Heebo's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 597
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Prove it.


Hahaha finally got to use that line when it was relevant.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No offense bud I appreciate your imput but this is the exact kind of posts I'm trying to avoid.
But seriously - that's the second time you've used the word imput like it's a real word. Please stop.
__________________
  #3  
Old 08-04-2013, 09:16 AM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Prove it.


Hahaha finally got to use that line when it was relevant.
No sir prove that it wasn't. You made the poll
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #4  
Old 08-04-2013, 09:54 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No sir prove that it wasn't. You made the poll
Training was never allowed, where did you get the idea that it was? Rogean already said the current p99 rule set for VP was not derived from any live EQ policies like 9 pages ago, I think.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #5  
Old 08-04-2013, 10:01 AM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Training was never allowed, where did you get the idea that it was? Rogean already said the current p99 rule set for VP was not derived from any live EQ policies like 9 pages ago, I think.
Already got 2 live servers saying training was allowed.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #6  
Old 08-04-2013, 10:04 AM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,519
Default

FE would poopsock PD for a week straight just like they do VS if it wasn't for the current ruleset. I think we should extend the VP rules to the VS pit in KC.
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
  #7  
Old 08-04-2013, 10:06 AM
xmonkx xmonkx is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 528
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
FE would poopsock PD for a week straight just like they do VS if it wasn't for the current ruleset. I think we should extend the VP rules to the VS pit in KC.
I see what you did there Jeremy. And honestly I dont believe Vianna understands FE's history and training. Last raid suspension for training outside of vp was oooo lemmie think.... FE
__________________
[60 Grandmaster] Sericx
[60 Oracle] Villexo
[60 Arch Mage] Roenik
[60 Warlord] Zenaa Woiyaprincess
[60 High Priest] Razta Farian
[29 Enchanter] Beky
<The Mystical Order>
  #8  
Old 08-04-2013, 10:07 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
FE would poopsock PD for a week straight just like they do VS if it wasn't for the current ruleset. I think we should extend the VP rules to the VS pit in KC.
Cmon guy stop rants and flaming in my post seriously, if you're going to post atleast offer some logical explanation why training needs to be allowed. Especially considering TMO has had pretty much free reign over VP uncontested for a long time, whats to bad about a little change? You guys want competition right? Why can't it be more fair competition?
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #9  
Old 08-04-2013, 10:09 AM
xmonkx xmonkx is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 528
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Cmon guy stop rants and flaming in my post seriously, if you're going to post atleast offer some logical explanation why training needs to be allowed. Especially considering TMO has had pretty much free reign over VP uncontested for a long time, whats to bad about a little change? You guys want competition right? Why can't it be more fair competition?
Is it not fair because your monks/sk's/necros suck? All it takes is 1 maybe MAYBE 2 good trainers to derail a kill.
__________________
[60 Grandmaster] Sericx
[60 Oracle] Villexo
[60 Arch Mage] Roenik
[60 Warlord] Zenaa Woiyaprincess
[60 High Priest] Razta Farian
[29 Enchanter] Beky
<The Mystical Order>
  #10  
Old 08-04-2013, 10:47 AM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
FE would poopsock PD for a week straight just like they do VS if it wasn't for the current ruleset. I think we should extend the VP rules to the VS pit in KC.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Cmon guy stop rants and flaming in my post seriously, if you're going to post atleast offer some logical explanation why training needs to be allowed. Especially considering TMO has had pretty much free reign over VP uncontested for a long time, whats to bad about a little change? You guys want competition right? Why can't it be more fair competition?
This isn't RnFing your post - it's a pretty solid reason among a number of others, in my opinion.

Tasslehof, did you ever think that the staff said to themselves "well shit is going to happen in VP, rules or not, and we don't need another slew of headaches each week," or something to this effect? VP is a large and dangerous zone - shit is going to happen. I can't really blame the staff for not wanting to deal with it. There's damn near 100 zones in which you can play PetitionQuest - I personally am thankful that VP is not one of them because I think if they were forced to sort out foul play issues here, it would seriously discourage action from being taken anywhere.

I'm going for a boat ride - I will add more to this later!
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:39 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.