Teams - whats better?

[Danien]

Originally Posted by Tradesonred [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It looks good on paper, but like i said back in this thread, hardcoded teams has no fluidity. If one team gets too powerful, like it looks like it was evil on live, then youre fucked, your servers dead and it becomes a PVE server, again.

What you say has value, but you make enemies alot less permanent by removing xp loss out of the equation.

One side will almost certainly become substantially stronger then the other teams, much like it was on live. Same thing applies for ffa-pvp too though, only then the teams will be called guilds.

That doesn't mean it still won't be fun to play though.

[Tradesonred]

Originally Posted by Danien [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

One side will almost certainly become substantially stronger then the other teams, much like it was on live. Same thing applies for ffa-pvp too though, only then the teams will be called guilds.

That doesn't mean it still won't be fun to play though.

The difference is that if your team sucks, then it sucks for good, youre stuck there. You cant leave it like you can leave a guild to see if you get along more with Guild X or Y, or if guild Z has figured out how to assist yet. It has no fluidity, its gotta be fluid. Gotta think fluid (TM)

[Danien]

Originally Posted by Tradesonred [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The difference is that if your team sucks, then it sucks for good, youre stuck there. You cant leave it like you can leave a guild to see if you get along more with Guild X or Y, or if guild Z has figured out how to assist yet. It has no fluidity, its gotta be fluid. Gotta think fluid (TM)

Not worth sacrificing the other benefits of teams in order to attain fluidity.

[Mittens Romney]

The difference would be that each team may have guilds and players that dislike each other but they will stick together to fight the other team.