HE WALKS

[Alawen]

You are incapable of seeing beyond your closed-mindedness and bigotry. You prove that month after month in these forums. Your IQ is somewhere between 115 and 120, nearly three standard deviations below mine.

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Alawen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You are incapable of seeing beyond your closed-mindedness and bigotry. You prove that month after month in these forums. Your IQ is somewhere between 115 and 120, nearly three standard deviations below mine.

closed-mindedness and bigotry have nothing to do with it. the law and its fair application have everything to do with it, which is why white was found guilty and his appeal denied while zimmerman was found not guilty. i can explain this to you if necessary.

you have no idea what my iq is. even i don't know, as i've never taken a proper iq test. but seeing as i've achieved perfect scores on two (2) standardized tests that mensa will accept as transferable, i am virtually certain your estimate would be incorrect. based on linear regression, a perfect score on one of these tests would indicate an iq of 145+. this may be accurate or inaccurate -- i don't much care. plenty of shut-ins and janitors have high iqs. plenty of world leaders don't. but your supposed superiority is a construct of your own imagination, not reality.

please let me know if and when you'd like your hand held through these two cases. i would be glad to help you make a bit more of your iq

[Alawen]

Originally Posted by Daldolma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

closed-mindedness and bigotry have nothing to do with it. the law and its fair application have everything to do with it, which is why white was found guilty and his appeal denied while zimmerman was found not guilty. i can explain this to you if necessary.

you have no idea what my iq is. even i don't know, as i've never taken a proper iq test. but seeing as i've achieved perfect scores on two (2) standardized tests that mensa will accept as transferable, i am virtually certain your estimate would be incorrect. based on linear regression, a perfect score on one of these tests would indicate an iq of 145+. this may be accurate or inaccurate -- i don't much care. plenty of shut-ins and janitors have high iqs. plenty of world leaders don't. but your supposed superiority is a construct of your own imagination, not reality.

please let me know if and when you'd like your hand held through these two cases. i would be glad to help you make a bit more of your iq

I presented a contrasting instance. You, as usual, immediately resorted to ad hominem commentary. You have a small mind and I don't really care what you say. I would put you on ignore, but instead I am just going to ignore you, racist.

[Daldolma]

Originally Posted by Alawen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I presented a contrasting instance. You, as usual, immediately resorted to ad hominem commentary. You have a small mind and I don't really care what you say. I would put you on ignore, but instead I am just going to ignore you, racist.

i genuinely thought you were trolling. you're too smart to actually believe those cases are equivalent from a legal standpoint, especially to the extent that you would accuse anyone who disagrees of racism

if you'd like to understand why these cases are very different from a legal perspective, please let me know. if you'd like to continue believing the jury in new york, the jury in florida, and the appellate court in new york are all racist to the extent they can not return a just verdict in parallel cases, i suppose that's your prerogative. but it isn't me that's being small-minded