Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-06-2013, 06:05 PM
Fael Fael is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 617
Default

Actually, if it came in at all it would be because the defendant in a criminal case typically gets more of a pass when it comes to getting potentially unfairly prejudicial evidence. The rules of evidence is more concerned about a defendant being unfairly prejudiced than a victim.

Here, what you worry about, as a judge I would imagine, is that the evidence of MJ use would lead the jury to believe, as many people on these boards have suggested, that TM is a dead beat kid who, even if murdered, isn't much use to society, etc. That type of conclusion, of course, is unfairly prejudicial.

Moreover, you have other issues. Even if the evidence makes it 1% more likely TM would act hyper aggressively, you would still have to show that he was affected by the drug at the time, which i am not sure there was evidence of that. That too would substantially diminish the probative value of the evidence. It would also take time to put on experts to have a trial within a trial in regards to how likely it was that TM was effected by the MJ at that time. All the while, the subtext is how TM is a dead beat druggy.

Moreoever, this evidence itself is only conditionally relevant to the issue at stake here, which is whether or not Zimmerman reasonably feared for his life. Yes, perhaps it would make it marginally more likely that TM acted in a manner consistent with Zimmerman's story, and thus he acted reasonably in fearing for his life. But the Jury has other ways to evaluate the truthfullness of Zimmerman's story, without the state's case being subjected to an impermissible and irrelevant character assault.

Dolic
  #2  
Old 07-07-2013, 08:16 PM
TarukShmaruk TarukShmaruk is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 217
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Actually, if it came in at all it would be because the defendant in a criminal case typically gets more of a pass when it comes to getting potentially unfairly prejudicial evidence. The rules of evidence is more concerned about a defendant being unfairly prejudiced than a victim.

Here, what you worry about, as a judge I would imagine, is that the evidence of MJ use would lead the jury to believe, as many people on these boards have suggested, that TM is a dead beat kid who, even if murdered, isn't much use to society, etc. That type of conclusion, of course, is unfairly prejudicial.

Moreover, you have other issues. Even if the evidence makes it 1% more likely TM would act hyper aggressively, you would still have to show that he was affected by the drug at the time, which i am not sure there was evidence of that. That too would substantially diminish the probative value of the evidence. It would also take time to put on experts to have a trial within a trial in regards to how likely it was that TM was effected by the MJ at that time. All the while, the subtext is how TM is a dead beat druggy.

Moreoever, this evidence itself is only conditionally relevant to the issue at stake here, which is whether or not Zimmerman reasonably feared for his life. Yes, perhaps it would make it marginally more likely that TM acted in a manner consistent with Zimmerman's story, and thus he acted reasonably in fearing for his life. But the Jury has other ways to evaluate the truthfullness of Zimmerman's story, without the state's case being subjected to an impermissible and irrelevant character assault.

Dolic
I think the issue I have here is that any drugs or alcohol in Zimmerman's system at the time would have been brought into the trial, but drugs or alcohol in Martin's system could have had the same affect (perhaps made Martin more aggressive or reckless in his assault on Zimmerman).

That said I'm pretty sure nobody in the history of the world has tried to kill someone *because* they were high.
  #3  
Old 07-07-2013, 08:24 PM
Malice_Mizer Malice_Mizer is offline
Aviak

Malice_Mizer's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ATL
Posts: 61
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TarukShmaruk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I think the issue I have here is that any drugs or alcohol in Zimmerman's system at the time would have been brought into the trial, but drugs or alcohol in Martin's system could have had the same affect (perhaps made Martin more aggressive or reckless in his assault on Zimmerman).

That said I'm pretty sure nobody in the history of the world has tried to kill someone *because* they were high.
Good thing the definitely not-racist Sanford Police Department drug tested the dead body of Trayvon Martin but didn't bother asking a thing of the ZimZam. He could have been on PCP for all we know. That would actually shed a lot of light on this case.
  #4  
Old 07-07-2013, 08:30 PM
Supreme Supreme is offline
Planar Protector

Supreme's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rivervale,Texas
Posts: 1,077
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malice_Mizer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Good thing the definitely not-racist Sanford Police Department drug tested the dead body of Trayvon Martin but didn't bother asking a thing of the ZimZam. He could have been on PCP for all we know. That would actually shed a lot of light on this case.
Toxicology reports come from the coroners office.

I would like to spin this event though. Lets say that Zimmerman was a woman...and everything happened EXACTLY like it has been explained.

Would you still hate a lady Zimmerman?
  #5  
Old 07-07-2013, 08:46 PM
Malice_Mizer Malice_Mizer is offline
Aviak

Malice_Mizer's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ATL
Posts: 61
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supreme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Toxicology reports come from the coroners office.

I would like to spin this event though. Lets say that Zimmerman was a woman...and everything happened EXACTLY like it has been explained.

Would you still hate a lady Zimmerman?
I don't hate Zimmerman. I wouldn't hate hypothetical "lady Zimmerman."

And the pro-Zimmerman zeal would be even more intense and even more insanely racist if it was a white woman. Good Christ-- can you imagine typical southern American populism if it had a white woman vs. scary black man scenario on its hands? Sounds like a famous novel turned into an Oscar-winning classic movie, but the name escapes me.

P.S.: Speaking of lady Zimmerman, have you seen his sister? Holy God she looks EXACTLY LIKE HIM. It's quite shocking, actually.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #6  
Old 07-10-2013, 07:36 PM
Hasbinbad Hasbinbad is offline
Planar Protector

Hasbinbad's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Vallejo, CA
Posts: 3,067
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supreme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Would you still hate a lady Zimmerman?
If lady zimmerman, armed with a loaded gun, followed a 3.7gpa honors student walking home at night, shot him, yes.
__________________
  #7  
Old 07-07-2013, 08:31 PM
Frieza_Prexus Frieza_Prexus is offline
Fire Giant

Frieza_Prexus's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Houston, TX.
Posts: 750
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malice_Mizer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Good thing the definitely not-racist Sanford Police Department drug tested the dead body of Trayvon Martin but didn't bother asking a thing of the ZimZam. He could have been on PCP for all we know. That would actually shed a lot of light on this case.
They also failed to get Spengler and Venkman to come down with Tobin's Spirit Guide and a PKE meter to check for class VII wandering possessors.
__________________
Xasten <The Mystical Order>
Frieza <Stasis> 1999-2003 Prexus
"I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." JOHN 14:6
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.