Proof Global Warming Exists!!!!

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by guineapig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

By this logic, shouldn't we be waiting until we are attacked by terrorists again since we don’t actually have any proof of who is going to try and attack us?

I could probably think of a dozen other situations where this mindset would be extremely detrimental but I'm sure you realize this now.

Which attack on the WTC are you referring to, the first or the second? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Or the 300 attacks before that...? Need a scorecard to keep up with the who's who?

Originally Posted by guineapig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This type of shit doesn't belong anywhere in a debate. It's all heresay.

I'm sure the Roman Catholic Church used that argument during the inquisition, too. Just gotta follow the power and money trail.

In the end, you are still holding the bag regarding the need to provide proof of man-made global warming. Until then, I am not a believer and will do nothing to support the actions of those that want to and have implemented regulations. It's thuggery to push the issue in a negative way, only hurts their own position.

[Dersk]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm sure the Roman Catholic Church used that argument during the inquisition, too.

You're awfully sure about a lot of things, aren't you.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Dersk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're awfully sure about a lot of things, aren't you.

If you are walking down a dirt road and you see a turtle sitting on top a fence post, someone put the turtle there.

[Humerox]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you are walking down a dirt road and you see a turtle sitting on top a fence post, someone put the turtle there.

Turtles have been sighted doing unusual things:

Link

[guineapig]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm sure the Roman Catholic Church used that argument during the inquisition, too. Just gotta follow the power and money trail.

In the end, you are still holding the bag regarding the need to provide proof of man-made global warming. Until then, I am not a believer and will do nothing to support the actions of those that want to and have implemented regulations. It's thuggery to push the issue in a negative way, only hurts their own position.

Now you just aren't making any sense at all.

My comment:

This type of shit doesn't belong anywhere in a debate. It's all hearsay.

is in reference to the fact that you aren't posting anything factual at all. You are simply giving labels to people and gracing us with your wonderful opinions...

like this:

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I see nothing but a full fledged scam perpetrated by get-rich-quick power hungry con-artists, from scientists down to politicians. I say that because they try to force all this stuff on us with simply a "trust me" argument. That's indicative of a con-artist. All they need are jackboots and their attire would be complete. Prolly on layaway for the moment...

That's what's hearsay.

Perhaps you were thinking of the word heresy??? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by guineapig [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Now you just aren't making any sense at all.

My comment:



is in reference to the fact that you aren't posting anything factual at all. You are simply giving labels to people and gracing us with your wonderful opinions...

like this:



That's what's hearsay.

Perhaps you were thinking of the word heresy??? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Put on your glasses [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] That was not the full context of the post. That was a rant, followed by a point made in the paragraph before. Need I write everything in "wall of text" form to keep from getting dissected? But the rant is true enough in any case. If this were a formal debate thread... I would have added references to back up the rant [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] ...even though no sources are good enough for this "just trust me/them" crowd. I don't have enough faith to be a global warming advocate. Cuz that's what it takes, lots and lots of faith. Faith based science. meh

Yes read it as heresy, was outside at the time with my screen a bit glared from the sunlight. Seemed to fit anyhoot, global warming seems more religious if anything.