Beware the gnome Whukes

[Flamewraith]

Originally Posted by t0lkien [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nah, it was a scumbag move, and as someone said people are never sneaky in just one area of their lives. Forewarned is forearmed IMO.

I agree, and just by this guys explosive six year old attitude it is obvious that he is a shady selfish prick. Just my opinion though.

[Rhambuk]

I feel for whukes here....

the entire server is jumping on this guys face because the op claims he ksd him.

well fuck rogean ks'd me 3 years ago, wheres the hate thread about him?

seriously you people....

[Ambrotos]

You can be at a camp and not respond to someone, as long as you are clearing the placeholder/camp. It's defined in the rules.

Fast forward 5.5 hours and I notice that Whukes is back. So I /wave to him but got no response, figuring he was making breakfast or something. So I continue watching shitty cartoons on TV until I do indeed hear the ominous sounds of spell casting going on (I'm also surprised that Hadden didn't attack me as I am an iksar and was standing practically ontop of him).

AFK camping is camping with your pet killing stuff for you while you're afk.

Facts:
Whukes was there
Haden Spawned: Sun Jun 30, 2013; 07:51:23
Whukes engaged 07:51:30* Used enstill, 2 second cast time* (I know his logs say differently, this is why we never accept player logs for any petitions)
Katanagatari engaged 07:51:36 ( a full 7 seconds or so after Whukes did)

Conclusion of what the logs show? Katanagatari either helping or trying to ks Whukes, due to the time difference of spawn time/engagement time.

Whukes walks away with earring.

[LiQuid]

Originally Posted by Ambrotos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can be at a camp and not respond to someone, as long as you are clearing the placeholder/camp. It's defined in the rules.



AFK camping is camping with your pet killing stuff for you while you're afk.

Facts:
Whukes was there
Haden Spawned: Sun Jun 30, 2013; 07:51:23
Whukes engaged 07:51:30* Used enstill, 2 second cast time* (I know his logs say differently, this is why we never accept player logs for any petitions)
Katanagatari engaged 07:51:36 ( a full 7 seconds or so after Whukes did)

Conclusion of what the logs show? Katanagatari either helping or trying to ks Whukes, due to the time difference of spawn time/engagement time.

Whukes walks away with earring.

Do your logs show Kata being in the zone for 6 hours while Whukes was only logged in for a half hour? Wouldn't that show that Kata was camping whereas Whukes just timed the spawn and showed up for the kill?

I once had a GM rule against my confirmed (by GM logs) FTE and award loot to another player, I assume this is because of a subjective analysis that the other player was "camping" the mob and I had just recently zoned in and found him up.

[Rhambuk]

Originally Posted by Ambrotos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Whukes walks away with earring.

Cheers ambro!

I hope the rest of you can get off your high horse and apologize to whukes now.

The mangnome did nothing wrong but since the op throws out an accusation the community is ready to lynch him..

Since ambro's logs show differently are all of you whukes haters going to switch sides and start bashing the op for being a kser? laughable....

[Reguiy]

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cheers ambro!

I hope the rest of you can get off your high horse and apologize to whukes now.

The mangnome did nothing wrong but since the op throws out an accusation the community is ready to lynch him..

Since ambro's logs show differently are all of you whukes haters going to switch sides and start bashing the op for being a kser? laughable....

This thread turned into a witch-hunt when Whukes responded in an offensive and childish manner. Also, whether or not Whukes was in the right or wrong (technically), it's still BM to do what he did, considering the OP was clearly there for much longer. Whereas whukes was logging in when he thought Hadden would be up soon. BTW! Ambros just said those were FACTS. He didn't judge who was in the right or wrong [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Reguiy]

Originally Posted by Ambrotos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Haden Spawned: Sun Jun 30, 2013; 07:51:23
Whukes engaged 07:51:30* Used enstill, 2 second cast time* (I know his logs say differently, this is why we never accept player logs for any petitions)
Katanagatari engaged 07:51:36 ( a full 7 seconds or so after Whukes did)

Conclusion of what the logs show? Katanagatari either helping or trying to ks Whukes, due to the time difference of spawn time/engagement time.

Whukes walks away with earring.

So since Katan waited 7 seconds to engage he forfeited his camp? Serious question.

[TarukShmaruk]

Originally Posted by Reguiy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So since Katan waited 7 seconds to engage he forfeited his camp? Serious question.

This is what I'm wondering.

If Katan is there the entire time and Whukes just logs in and tags first does he get kill?

With a long camp like Hadden it's pretty understandable that it would take 7 seconds to engage if you've been there the whole time.

[kylok]

Originally Posted by Ambrotos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can be at a camp and not respond to someone, as long as you are clearing the placeholder/camp. It's defined in the rules.

Facts:
Whukes was there
Haden Spawned: Sun Jun 30, 2013; 07:51:23
Whukes engaged 07:51:30* Used enstill, 2 second cast time* (I know his logs say differently, this is why we never accept player logs for any petitions)
Katanagatari engaged 07:51:36 ( a full 7 seconds or so after Whukes did)

I see 13 seconds between my engagement of Hadden and Hadden's spawn. Thanks for looking into this Ambrotos it is very appreciated and enlightening.

[Swish]

TL;DR?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]