PSA: ATTN - If you are bound in raid zones, read this

[heartbrand]

Correct. I've never stated despite your poor reading comp that these aren't unbindable raid zones. Just that the intention and ruling by amelinda at the time was that those with the bind point need not change it. If Sirken has decided to now amend that rule that's fine, though I think we should reexamine the need for the rule to begin with and contemplate either removing it altogether or expanding it for the reasons I've written prior. However, calling it retroactively an exploit doesn't logically make sense to me, it's simply an argument of semantics with no real in game implications.

[Something'Witty]

Not that anyone cares what I think, but...

Define what constitutes a "raid zone" and expand current Sol B and Permafrost rules to those zones, or get rid of the restrictions. Arguments can be made for both options, but anything in between will just result in confusion and more of these kind of threads...

Now back to forumquest!

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Something'Witty [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not that anyone cares what I think, but...

Define what constitutes a "raid zone" and expand current Sol B and Permafrost rules to those zones, or get rid of the restrictions. Arguments can be made for both options, but anything in between will just result in confusion and more of these kind of threads...

Now back to forumquest!

How dare you make a perfectly reasonable and logical post. I think that the current FFA rules are out dated now that casters spawn with no mana. You can't bind rush if you spawn with no mana or have no gear as a melee. But if we're going to consider it a logical basis still to keep the FFA raid zone distinction we should consider updating / expanding it to TD / EJ / SF / KC, all zones with raid mobs where binding and out of range players have griefed raids prior.