PSA: ATTN - If you are bound in raid zones, read this

[Sirken]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How is it an "exploit" if there was never a written or even verbal rule against it?

LOL. really man?

so by your logic, its technically not an exploit until someone makes the staff aware of it? logic so incredibly flawed

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

LOL. really man?

so by your logic, its technically not an exploit until someone makes the staff aware of it? logic so incredibly flawed

Amelinda was well aware of it. It has been FOURTEEN months with ZERO comment on the issue, and even at the time of the debate of changes to red, not once was there a proposal of retroactive change to peoples binds. NO ONE, not a single person, EVER took the stance that retroactive removal of binds was appropriate or would be enforced, over the course of a two month debate of changes to Red, and not one post or comment was made by a GM on the issue, including ones such as Amelinda who witnessed it. To now call it an "exploit" seems pretty ludicrous to me given these facts. I have ZERO issue with now going forward instituting this rule, I just take issue with it being called an "exploit", and it seems to be in line with everything else on this server, rules made up and changed on the whim with zero idea for the players what is an exploit what is not what is legal what is not.

[Sirken]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Amelinda was well aware of it. It has been FOURTEEN months with ZERO comment on the issue, and even at the time of the debate of changes to red, not once was there a proposal of retroactive change to peoples binds. NO ONE, not a single person, EVER took the stance that retroactive removal of binds was appropriate or would be enforced, over the course of a two month debate of changes to Red, and not one post or comment was made by a GM on the issue, including ones such as Amelinda who witnessed it. To now call it an "exploit" seems pretty ludicrous to me given these facts. I have ZERO issue with now going forward instituting this rule, I just take issue with it being called an "exploit", and it seems to be in line with everything else on this server, rules made up and changed on the whim with zero idea for the players what is an exploit what is not what is legal what is not.

i give zero fawks what amelinda was aware of. the entire reason bind was apparently removed from these zones was due to players abusing the privilege of being bound there, and giving themselves unintended advantages. when we as a staff removed binding from these zones we did not do that to further grant an advantage to players bound there, we did it to put an end to all that. now its been pointed out that some players are still bound there.

so in short, until Everyone can bind there, Nobody can bind there.