PSA: ATTN - If you are bound in raid zones, read this

[Nizzarr]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

non bindable raidzones doesnt equal all zones with a dragon.

L2readingcomprehension

might wanna review which zones need to be tagged as raid zones then.

Whats the big deal with being bound in solb or permafrost?

[Sirken]

Originally Posted by Nizzarr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

might wanna review which zones need to be tagged as raid zones then.

Whats the big deal with being bound in solb or permafrost?

the raid ones. with raid mobs. that are not bindable.

the big deal is that the zones are not bindable and gives some player an unfair and unintended advantage. if we wanted players bound there, we'd allow binding there.


got it?

[Elderan]

Originally Posted by Sirken [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the raid ones. with raid mobs. that are not bindable.

the big deal is that the zones are not bindable and gives some player an unfair and unintended advantage. if we wanted players bound there, we'd allow binding there.


got it?

This made sense in classic.

But not now. No reason solb/perma should be labeled as a raid zone anymore.

[Andis]

Originally Posted by Elderan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This made sense in classic.

But not now. No reason solb/perma should be labeled as a raid zone anymore.

lol just cuz its not being farmed weekly like it used to, doesnt mean it should be changed

still a raid zone, whether farmed or not

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Andis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol just cuz its not being farmed weekly like it used to, doesnt mean it should be changed

still a raid zone, whether farmed or not

So do you think KC should be a raid zone as well? Surely you would agree that if Vox, a mob rarely if ever killed with lackluster loot is a "raid mob", then VS who drops BiS greaves for every class / epic drops, should be considered a "raid mob" as well and hence the zone should be labeled a raid zone? After all, both Vox and VS are 7 day spawns, level 55 mobs, and traditionally greatly contested.

p.s., you might want to ring Abysal to change his bind point from fear before he eats a ban for this

[Andis]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So do you think KC should be a raid zone as well? Surely you would agree that if Vox, a mob rarely if ever killed with lackluster loot is a "raid mob", then VS who drops BiS greaves for every class / epic drops, should be considered a "raid mob" as well and hence the zone should be labeled a raid zone? After all, both Vox and VS are 7 day spawns, level 55 mobs, and traditionally greatly contested.

p.s., you might want to ring Abysal to change his bind point from fear before he eats a ban for this

um no

I think zones that are labeled raid zones have been labeled raid zones for a reason

and zones that have not been labeled raid zones, have not been for a reason

just cuz a certain mob is in one zone does not make it a raid zone

it is the way of the eq game

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Andis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

um no

I think zones that are labeled raid zones have been labeled raid zones for a reason

and zones that have not been labeled raid zones, have not been for a reason

just cuz a certain mob is in one zone does not make it a raid zone

it is the way of the eq game

What is the reason then out of curiosity, and wouldn't Vox be the epitome of this strange logic? You have one outdated level 55 mob sitting in a low level dungeon and it's flagged a "raid" zone, as opposed to KC, a high level zone with the best item in the game [t-staff] and a current raid mob.

[Lazortag]

Originally Posted by Nizzarr [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

might wanna review which zones need to be tagged as raid zones then.

Whats the big deal with being bound in solb or permafrost?

"I disagree with the rules, therefore, it's okay for me to break them"

[heartbrand]

Originally Posted by Lazortag [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

"I disagree with the rules, therefore, it's okay for me to break them"

Where did he say it's "ok" to "break" them? First of all, "breaking them" implies that prior to this post it has always been disallowed to keep your bind here, yet there's no post or rule anywhere that says such. Secondly, he's not saying it's "ok" to now break the rule, just that it doesn't make logical sense to apply this rule to these zones and not now extend them to others or to revisit which zones deserve said tag and which one's don't. No where did he say he is going to refuse to comply with this now new rule. And how is it even possible to be "breaking" the rule when Sirken gave everyone until July 1st to change it, therefore meaning that the deadline hasn't even arrived? Your logic is pitiful.