Svenn ninja loots a NoS, writes a thread about it.

[Signal]

Originally Posted by Splorf22 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm pretty sure another group killing a full round of your camp is the definition of 'no presence at the camp'. So are you saying if I am killing random frogs at the entrance i can claim the disco?

And I am confused about the inconsistency of your story because a) you are claiming that powafull dragging your rogue was some huge delay but b) you are claiming your rogue was back in camp and c) you are giving me the story in bits and pieces

As soon as the 2nd group arrived and started killing mobs a petition was put in...That is why the GM had logs and a time to make a decision off of when he got there. It being put in by the rogue who was also there showed they had 2 people at camp. The leader of the group there simply sat and waited on a GM to show up to see what was going on. She even told the necro not to hit mobs. The only mobs they engaged while waiting were first the pathers that the group there was too slow to get back to to kill before they respawned and then the PHs that were up in that same cycle because again the 2nd group were very slow going down to emp and killing the 2 PH'es there.

There was no need to run over each other for mobs while waiting on a GM to come so they simply waited instead of making the camp a hectic shit storm like the other group was doing by pulling mobs on top of corpses that they were trying to rez. Which is funny now because "The tank" is trying to deny it now. They could have very easily engaged the same mobs that the other group were killing and making it a worse than it already was because of the antics of the 2nd group. The rogue again even told the other group this in say. She calmly asked them to stop killing mobs in their camp and then informed them the petition was put in and they would wait on a GM. That is when the OOC messages started in seb btw. Which were hilarious for everyone reading I am sure.

IF you think it hasn't been explained clearly I am not going over it again. The camp was obviously given back to the first group for a reason.... The decision that was made obviously doesn't go along with your ideals of way things should be decided obviously. Suffice to say though.... They obviously were found to have a presence at camp that was sufficient enough to hold the camp or it would not have went that way. You can come in RNF all day and say "that was wrong" because the decision went against you.... But anyone with decency and common sense can see the camp was theirs and they were there at the camp when the other group arrived.

I repeat again Killing mobs in crypt isn't hard it doesn't take an insane group to accomplish it. Emperor is the only one that can cause problems if you do it wrong. Which the first group did in this case. The rest doesn't take some herculean effort to kill.... It just takes longer to kill based on who is there and who isn't. You can't steal a camp cause "They weren't killing the mobs fast enough while they were recovering". They had a camp presence and had shown all day they could kill those mobs... Which the logs showed. Better luck next time trying to spin and rule lawyer.