I will put it to you this way, I have argued forever that marriage shouldn't be federally recognized (although the states are free to do as they please). Not because of the fictitious entity of separation of church and state, that would almost so far as to mean you couldn't be married and a public servant, but because it does respect an establishment of religion (namely the Judaism if we want to get into the origins). To this end I would say the Defense of Marriage Act, signed by your beloved Bill Clinton, is also unconstitutional.
| 
11-01-2012, 10:57 PM
Threaded Mode