So that's it for the election.

[Splorf22]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Science ventures out into the unknown everyday. Hence the term scientific discovery. Science would try to solve a question, a question like.... how was the universe created. The god option would be a path to test.

Sorry you failed so hard there. Agnostics believe that the divine is unknowable.

Alarti, if I were you I would stop arguing with Orruar, because you haven't won too many rounds so far [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] He's exactly right here. There are basically 3 kinds of empirical statements:

* Statements which can be proven wrong (i.e. the sun is blue)
* Statements which have not yet been proven wrong but can be (most of what we consider science)
* Statements which cannot be proven wrong (i.e. God)

There is no experiment you can design that will disprove the existence of God. It's purely a matter of faith or not. Or, to requote Pauli, it's not even right or wrong, just unproveable. And religions are usually designed to make it so.