Ragefire Agreement/Rotation

[Splorf22]

Originally Posted by Ele [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

EQ doesn't have a magical bubble that prevents other people from contesting stuff. I'm honestly surprised no one outside of IB/TMO came in to contest it.


Also it wasn't a TMO - IB guild based rotation, it was an agreement amongst the clerics with the most time at the camp, just so happens they were from IB/TMO. We randomed for the slots, which people now call a "rotation".

The OP was an attempt to demonstrate that it could be handled peacefully and to seek additional input from the rest of the community regarding how to go forward from here on out. The patch, thankfully, has been implemented so we should be seeing 2-6 ragefires per week instead of the previous 1 per 9 days. I would still like to see something worked out to prevent another FFA click fest.

Look I don't have a problem with how things turned out and I don't see how you got that from my post. As far as I'm concerned, if you put the time in you get the gear. If the whole server had gotten together and made sure Ninik got the first one, I think that would have been pretty awesome . . but we didn't, and that's OK too. I'm purely pointing out the hypocrisy of anyone in IB/TMO bitching about VD taking a Ragefire or two and not giving a spot to Ninik when they did the exact same thing for two months.

Anyway with 3 ragefires per week this problem will disappear fast. In a few months tops every cleric will have one.