All Hail Macken. Defender of the scoreboards.

[Macken]

However, websites containing academic or historical content related to such subjects are permitted to participate in AdSense.





Justice Scalia: Religious Schools Should Have A Special Right To Anti-Gay Discrimination
By Ian Millhiser on Sep 26, 2011 at 3:20 pm

In a speech at the historically Catholic Duquesne University School of Law, conservative Justice Antonin Scalia urged the university not to stray from a religious identity hostile to gay and lesbian students:

“Our educational establishment these days, while so tolerant of and even insistent upon diversity in all other aspects of life seems bent on eliminating diversity of moral judgment — particularly moral judgment based on religious views,” Scalia said.

As examples, he cited attempts to sue a religious university in Washington, D.C., for offering only same-sex dorms and other attempts by a law school association to bar schools that discriminate against homosexuals.

“I hope this place will not yield — as some Catholic institutions have — to this politically correct insistence upon suppression of moral judgment, to this distorted view of what diversity in America means,” Scalia said.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


There. That solves that. You are now a website with both Academic and Historical content. Now you won't have to be a amoral lackey for google anymore.

Besides, what i said was not the least bit untrue or demeaning or dehumanizing. What i said is an unassailable and undenyable fact. Homosexuality is weakening America as an academic and historical fact. If we were all homosexuals because it was that good of an idea, after 35 years we would die out as a nation. Everyone who can understand the science of procreation and fertility rates such as someone who works at the UN or a 11 year old girl who just found out about the birds and bees can understand this fact.

Your forum policy of bigotry against those of religious backgrounds is hypocritical to say the least.

But i digress. We both know this academic and historic fact of weakness was not why you censored that and other posts. If that was the case then you would have censored the posts with the word effeminate in them.

I believe you are equipped with the intelligence to perform the job you have been tasked with. You obviously have ulterior motives. I fully understand that if I were to call for a vote of no-confidence against Defender Guinea, the senate would fracture and there would be further weakness at a crucial time in developement. For these reasons, I wish to rest my case here. And may events be fortunate for Guinea.