Is warrior aggro greatly exaggerated?

[Jimjam]

Rangers may make more aggro than knights, but that is irrelevant as knights already make more than enough.

Likewise, knights may tank better than rangers, but rangers can tank fungi king fine pre 60, what worse will they need to tank in an xp group?

I don’t think it matters who you have tanking in an xp group - you take what is available (or in a static you take what wants to be played).