New Druid Advice from the experts

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by bcbrown [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The way I read the exchange it was DSM who misread Loramin.

DSM says one of the main benefits is the mana it saves [on casting invis]. Loramin critiques that and says "saving invis mana" as a shorthand for "saving mana on casting invis". He's not making up some new "invis mana" concept.

This makes no sense. To his credit, Loramin admitted he read my post wrong:

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Maybe I misread you on the mana thing

I am sorry your gotcha post failed again. Please stop doing this, it doesn't help OP, make you look good, or make me look bad.

Originally Posted by loramin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The ring's power is not about saving invis mana, it's about saving mana on the (far more expensive) nukes you have to cast at the end of the fight

For context, he specified the mana saving wasn't for "invis mana", it was for nukes. Mana is mana, saving mana means you have more mana for any spell you want. I never claimed that the mana saved was exculsively used for invis.