Gearing a ranger

[Goregasmic]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=440

I did a post on 1h vs 2h DPS for my 52 Monk. In the low 50s 1h combos can out DPS 2h weapons. This is because the 2h damage bonus is smaller. My Epic Fist + SoS was out DPSing an IFS when I wasn't fistweaving. They were very similar when fistweaving. Rangers can't fistweave, so it wouldn't surprise me if something like Wurmslayer + Swiftwind could out-DPS a Woodsman Staff at 52.

That being said, Fear Kiting, Bow Kiting, or Jousting would probably work better for solo Rangers in their 50s. 1h weapons don't work well for any of those strategies, so it's somewhat of a moot point.

Hopefully Bcbrown will share some parsing at some point to see if there is any significant difference between Monks and Rangers. Monks do have higher dual wield in the low 50s, so that will be a bit different from a Ranger.

Yeah, as usual, trust but verify especially before 60 if you care to optimize. At 50 damage bonus and DW starts being significant and at 55+ ranger get an innate offensive bonus. Might play out a little different from expectations. Also, the mobs you fight might mix it up a little.

The previous numbers are weapon basics but other factors may skew the results. It is possible epic + SBoZ fares better (I'd hope so) but you're probably not too far off with an AP especially considering bow damage, weaving casts and jousting like snaggles said... for less than a tenth of the price.

If anything we're seeing both options are viable, which it kinda nice but it depends on your budget. I'm a big fan of slow two handers, feel so good when double attack connects for max damage but missing 4 times in a row when the mob is about to flee and you're about to hit low hp aggro... it makes you want to scream. I know some people can't stand it and I understand.