Player Agreement: Rule Change at the DS Camp

[fortior]

Originally Posted by sajbert [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You seem to be confused.

You're right that it's not a communal act to consult server staff and make a post, but he then appeals to the community, which is a communal act. He then proposes that the whole p99 community can share an element of game content instead of it being held down by a few guilds, allowed by current server and camp rules, which as with any other rules in this game can be subject to change.

Am I supposed to think this is a heinous act? That I am being deceived by this wolf in sheep's clothing? How dare he? Come on my guy, you're throwing vitriol here and it's not looking good.

I can see reasons for why people wouldn't wish for change and that's fine although I do think a considerable number are doing so for anything but altruistic reasons. And that's ultimately how it's going to be for most part. People who have something to lose, will say no. People who have something to gain will say yes.

He was told to appeal to the community, he had to be told that that was the way to go. Then just read the posts he makes in this thread: Loramin gave him good advice which he just discarded with a boilerplate response, same for several other posters. URN posters gave him good advice, same boilerplate responses. He has been completely disinterested in what other people have to say, only signal boosting people who agree with him. Note: URN requires no rule changes, keeps the content in the game, and requires no extra work on CSR's behalf.

I personally think he says the rudest things dressed up in polite language, and it's been very obvious from day 1:

Originally Posted by berbax [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm really looking for the change to happen on P99, so right now I'm looking for the community to come together and agree on this type of change, so that the Project1999 staff can help in enforcing it.

Not looking for input, not shopping around for ideas to make for a more compelling player agreement pitch, but looking for the "community to [..] agree", so that whoever doesn't agree can be strongarmed through CSR enforcement (extra work for CSR). When someone shows you who they are, believe them.